[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGP, Inc.--What were they thinking?
In <01bcdf5a$4a2d3a60$06060606@russell>, on 10/22/97
at 10:20 PM, "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <[email protected]> said:
>I really don't want to get into a standards flamewar, the point I'm
>making is that this is a bigger issue in the Enterprise market than key
>escrow at this point. Phil claims to have an RSA license, if he wants to
>go after the enterprise market he can support S/MIME.
Nothing personal Phil but that is the most brain dead sugestion I have
seen on this list in a long time. Well I can see that getting a paycheck
from Verisign hasn't tanted your viwes in favor of an inferior standard.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
---------------------------------------------------------------