[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> From: [email protected] (Lutz Donnerhacke)
> Subject: Re: CMR versus GAK? (fwd) > Right to monitor
> Date: 24 Oct 1997 14:01:04 GMT
> >Does the owner of a resource have an inherent right to control that
> >resource and if so what are the boundaries?
>
> He has this right until he touchs the rights of other people. So he have not
> all rights he might want.
>
> >Does the user of a resource have rights outside the purvue of the owner
> >of that resource and if so what are the boundaries?
>
> Do you own your house? If not, why do you stop your house owner from
> snooping in your flat? It's his ressource. Why do you encrypt e-mails over
> your provider's lines? It's his ressource.
>
> If privacy is outlawed in offices, nobody can work legally.
If this is the best argument and explanation of them you can muster then
quit now.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there |
| be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. |
| |
| -Alan Greenspan- |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| [email protected] |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|