[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Orthogonal (fwd)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Orthogonal (fwd)
From: Mark Rogaski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:28:33 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected] (Cypherpunks)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Jim Choate" at Oct 28, 97 11:29:30 pm
Sender: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

An entity claiming to be Jim Choate wrote:

: 
: How did the word get there, NOT what the word means. I KNOW what and how
: to use the word.

I agree with Jim, we have shown WHAT orthogonal means to the fields of
programming languages, computer theory, and software engineering.  The
question is WHY it was adopted.


: 
: Some of you people are fucking worthless for anything other than baiting.

Oh, come now, any human has many uses if you put your mind to it.
A cheap, renewable replacement for ballistic test gelatin, maybe? ;)

Mark

- -- 
[] Mark Rogaski                   "That which does not kill me
[] [email protected]                 only makes me stranger."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNFbloMHFI4kt/DQOEQJSAACeKYPsTTsdIkyWJmgBITIX+JBTGEUAoKfL
JyNmBdHK8OIM/qsNdzWA8T4q
=PB3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Orthogonal (fwd)
  - From: Jim Choate <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CMR versus GAK?
Next by Date: Re: Infastructure Protection and Paranoia
Prev by thread: Orthogonal (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Orthogonal (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread