[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A problem with anonymity
At 06:40 PM 9/2/95 +1300, David Murray wrote:
> I still think that, because of
> the (perfect) ease with which net.rep's are transferrable/cash-in-able,
> the chances you take in the digital domain are so much higher as to be
> (almost?) qualatatively different.
Then good names will have sufficient cash value, that their owners will
be deeply reluctant to damage those good names.
Obviously if one can obtain a good name cheaply, then in might be profitable
to misuse it. In which case we swiftly run short of good names, and they
become expensive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | [email protected]