Cypherpunks Date Index for 1995 09




  • Re: Fiat Shamir Zero Knowledge Test
  • sums with BIG numbers
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: sums with BIG numbers
  • Hmmm.. (fwd)
  • Re: sums with BIG numbers
  • Karl Hess meeting - L.A. area
  • FUHRMAN key escrow
  • Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: sums with BIG numbers
  • Re: opinions on RSA Secure?
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Web of Trust
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: FUHRMAN key escrow
  • Re: FUHRMAN key escrow
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: opinions on RSA Secure?
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Fuhrman needed a digital pseudonym!
  • No Subject
  • Re: Some details on RSA Secure
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Key Escrow Workshop agenda & discussion paper 3
  • Re: Fuhrman needed a digital pseudonym!
  • Different Keys for Signing and Encrypting
  • Re: Fuhrman needed a digital pseudonym!
  • Fuhrman needed a digital pseudonym!
  • Re: Web of Trust
  • Re: CIA & Espionage
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of S-1
  • Surveillance a Growing Problem
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Key Escrow Workshop agenda & discussion paper 3
  • Macintosh Users: "SpeedDoubler"
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • IETF security report
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Re: SSL search attack
  • Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: SSL attack
  • FSTC - Request for Info
  • Re: FSTC - Request for Info
  • Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Macintosh Users: "SpeedDoubler"
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Cypherpunks Santa Cruz -- Great Party!
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory
  • No Subject
  • Cyphernomicon for ftp
  • Crypto '95 report
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Nautilus 1.0 under OS/2 Warp?
  • Re: anyone know what this "top secret" code does?Re: anyone know what this "top secret" code does?
  • VoicePGP Query
  • Re: MIT distributing PGPfone -Reply
  • Re: PGPfone over Appletalk
  • Quickly checking signatures
  • Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
  • Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
  • Re: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Cyphernomicon
  • Re: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Mailing List Archive
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: Mailing List Archive
  • Dumb Question: PGPfone over Appletalk
  • Basic Public key algorithms.
  • Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
  • ASN.1 and Kerberos version 5
  • Austin Cypherpunks
  • Crypto '95
  • SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: O.J. ObCrypto: Fuhrman's Folly Fans Fakery Fears...
  • Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
  • Re: Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Re: sums with BIG numbers
  • A bold ssl idea ?
  • 260_xxx
  • ARS_tug
  • Re: Florida Drivers Permits and a Hello
  • Re: Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Slightly faster checking for encrypted messages to me
  • Re: Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Re: Florida Drivers Permits and a Hello
  • Re: A bold ssl idea ?
  • PEE_per
  • hks cypherpunks newsserver down
  • Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • Re: Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Mail to mail.cypherpunks "newsgroup" echoes to list
  • Looking for NII IP "White Paper"...
  • WEB pointers for NIS&T Key Escrow meeting
  • Re: Dumb Question: PGPfone over Appletalk
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: ASN.1 and Kerberos version 5
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • NIST attendee list
  • Re: NIST attendee list
  • Re: anyone know what this "top secret" code does?
  • Re: A bold ssl idea ?
  • LR/SHS src (386 ASM)
  • Re: Joel's RSA-t's
  • NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: SSL search attacks
  • pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • maximizing cryptographic return
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • European wilingness to pay ...
  • Re: Crypto '95: Robert Morris
  • Re: maximizing cryptographic return
  • rump session papers
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Oddly enough, Clipper is helpful
  • Clinton's Black Helicopters Over My House!
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Re: ASN.1 and Kerberos version 5
  • Reputations and Reading Preferences
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • RE: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • Re: Clinton's Black Helicopters Over My House!
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • MAN_iax
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: Clinton's Black Helicopters Over My House!
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Key attributes (was: pseudonyms & list health)
  • Re: maximizing cryptographic return
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • RE: Key attributes (was: pseudonyms & list health)
  • Acceptable NIS&T restrictions
  • The Dangers of Caribbean Data Havens
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe AlgorithimRe: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: Helping out on site
  • Re: The Dangers of Caribbean Data Havens
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • my crypto rump session abstract
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • alpha.c2.org nymserver source code
  • Re: The Dangers of Caribbean Data Havens
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: The Dangers of Caribbean Data Havens
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Returned mail: User unknown
  • Seattle area Cypherpunks
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Encrypted desktop videoconferencing
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: pseudonyms & list health
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Identity Agnostic Online Cash
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: Acceptable NIS&T restrictions
  • Re: Basic Public key algorithms.
  • Q: PGPfone where
  • maximizing cryptographic return
  • (NOISE) Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • SecureDrive 1.4 Announcement Correction
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: A problem with anonymity
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • article/author ratings/reputations (was Re: pseudonyms & list health)
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • DUMPSTER BONANZA
  • Re: article/author ratings/reputations (was Re: pseudonyms & list health)
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: maximizing cryptographic return
  • Re: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memoryRe: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: Non-US SSL128 site
  • Re: Non-US SSL128 site
  • Re: Non-US SSL128 site
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • "This discussion is off-topic, please take it elsewhere"
  • Re: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory
  • Re: response (fwd)
  • Re: Slightly faster checking for encrypted messages to me
  • A recent article on Electronic Commerce
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • [[email protected]: Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code]
  • Re: SSL trouble
  • Re: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: Acceptable NIS&T restrictions
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: Non-US SSL128 site
  • Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • approx of bignum^rational
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Son of Clipper (commentary)
  • RE: VCRPLUS Huffman code
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Police and scientology visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Secure Device 1.4 QuestionSecure Device 1.4 Question
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Emergency File Wipe Algorithim
  • Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • Key Certification by US Post Office
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Lotus Notes vs. the Web and the Net
  • Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: SUMMARY: Not-so-volatile volatile memory
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Non-Delivery Notification
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Are booby-trapped... [Detailed treatment]
  • Re: Crypto '95
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: SSLRef (SSLtelnet)
  • Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
  • ANNOUNCE: September 1995 SF Bay Area physical meeting
  • Equinox/cypherpunks/www
  • Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • Re: Secure Device 1.4 Question
  • Re: Police and scientology visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Searchable Crypto Paper Archive?
  • Re: Lotus Notes vs. the Web and the Net
  • Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • the S-1 Algorithm
  • Re: "This discussion is off-topic, please take it elsewhere"
  • RE: Equinox/cypherpunks/www
  • Michael Moriarity in _Penthouse_ on Law Enforcer Power Expansion
  • Re: Forgery, bills, and the Four Horsemen (Articles and Comment)
  • Re: "This discussion is off-topic, please take it elsewhere"
  • Re: Searchable Crypto Paper Archive?
  • Re: Searchable Crypto Paper Archive?
  • "Living in real time, side A" (article ref)
  • Re: Searchable Crypto Paper Archive?
  • Re: Searchable Crypto Paper Archive?
  • cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Anonymous CU-SeeMe reflector
  • Anonymous http daemon?
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Where is Secure Drive 1.4?
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Collection of personal info
  • booby-traps, crypto, guns, and tea
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Direct Socket to Remailer?
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Flame: Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • fast modular reduction
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • e$ sites of interest
  • Re: Are booby-trapped... [Detailed treatment]
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • Symbols on the net :)
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: e$ sites of interest
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Collection of persona
  • University logging mail to anon.penet (fwd)
  • Re: Collection of personal information etc. etc. etc.
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Collection of persona
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • ULC Online
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • What is truth?
  • ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • Collection of persona
  • Diskreet Disk Help Needed
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: What is truth?
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • subscripe
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Cybersecurity
  • Re: What is truth?
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Growth of actions definded as crime. Which math formula?
  • Cryptography Technical Report Server (CTRS) needs submissions!
  • Re: fast modular reduction (proof?)
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: fast modular reduction (proof?)
  • Force Ratios
  • Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Zimmerman's statute
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Another Son of Clipper discussion paper
  • Re: Cybersecurity
  • Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won't buy crypto
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Why Key Escrow (GAK) is So Bad
  • Crypto Anarchy and Virtual Communities
  • How to get to Saturday's meeting in SF?
  • PGP key disclosure
  • Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • Re: GAK
  • Why Key Escrow (GAK) is So Bad
  • GAK Hacks
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Force Ratios
  • Re: GAK
  • Industry Slams Gov's Encryption Export Plan
  • Re: GAK Hacks
  • Commercial Speech over Internet product
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: Kerberos v5's experience with ASN.1
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: ASN.1 and Kerberos version 5
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • Re: GAK Hacks
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: fast modular reduction
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Key Escrow Papers
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Commercial Speech over Internet product
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Legality of Cash Transactions
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: Commercial Speech over Internet product
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Collection of personal info
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • RE: Key Escrow Papers
  • Announce: Web of Trust Ring
  • Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Correction about who opposes crypto regulations....
  • Shams and Shame
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • NIST Escrow Papers - Now Web Available
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Usenix symposium on crypto applications
  • Ring: Server problem
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Magazine / Goodbye
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: Announce: Web of Trust Ring
  • Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: Why Key Escrow (GAK) is So Bad
  • Re: Announce: Web of Trust Ring
  • Re: Why Key Escrow (GAK) is So Bad
  • Key Escrow Papers via FTP
  • Re: Legality of Cash Transactions
  • NIST notes available
  • Re:(changed) Criminals and Crypto
  • Re: fast modular reduction (proof?)
  • Cypher Rant II: Why Private Cryptography should not be regulated.
  • Re: Cypher Rant II: Why Private Cryptography should not be regulated.
  • Day 2, nist GAK meeting
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Jimmy Upton's T-shirt (NIST's 9/6-7/95 meetings)
  • Cryptography Global Challenges
  • Darren Reed: Re: NSA and the Internet.
  • No Subject
  • Re: Darren Reed: Re: NSA and the Internet.
  • No Subject
  • No Subject
  • [NOISE] Re: Are booby-trapped computers legal?
  • Re: GAK Hacks
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Info Warthogs
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Re: GAK
  • Hacking banking (fwd)
  • Re: GAK Hacks
  • Car rentals, Driver's Licenses, Ecash, & Net Access
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • (Fwd) CFP: Workshop on Information Hiding
  • Re: Hacking banking (fwd)
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • 64-bit GAK && 128-bit hashes
  • Privacy book list
  • Re: Commercial Speech over Internet product
  • Re: Correction about who opposes crypto regulations....
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Looking for IETF old-timers (and others)
  • Cato Study Release: National ID Card Ineffective and Intrusive
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Re: Car rentals, Driver's Licenses, Ecash, & Net Access
  • [NOISE] Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC [NOISE]
  • Cypherpunks Lite archives now available
  • Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • 9K P6
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Privacy book list
  • Re: Key Escrow Papers
  • Re: Day 2, nist GAK meeting
  • Re: Slightly faster checking for encrypted messages to me
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • GAK Hacks and Position Surveillance
  • Re: Cyphernomicon
  • [NOISE]Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)
  • Re: ON OFF-TOPIC [NOISE]
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Libertarian Party and Crypto Anarchy
  • Re: GAK
  • Web Exon A-rate
  • Re: Libertarian Party and Crypto Anarchy
  • [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • Re: [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • Re: Web Exon A-rate
  • Re: GAK Hacks
  • Open letter to Geoff Greiveldinger, DoJ
  • Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • ===>> FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub sent worldwide- 315+ Popular USA Titles ===>> FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub sent worldwide- 315+ Popular USA Titles
  • Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails? (fwd)
  • Re: 9K P6
  • Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • WoT keyring (fwd)
  • Re[2]: [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • Re: WoT keyring
  • Re: Re[2]: [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • Re[4]: [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • DC-area Meeting Sept 16
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re[2]: [NOISE/Fun] some 'special' primes
  • Internet commerce mtg, Denver
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Bizdos citizenship?
  • Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • RSA licensing costs?
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Brand e-cash implementation?
  • Dishonest banks & ecash
  • Re: Bizdos citizenship?
  • Re: Internet commerce mtg, Denver
  • Re: Certificates/Anonymity/Policy/True Names
  • PGP in UK
  • remailers
  • PGP in UK and GAK
  • RSA lcensing costs?
  • 64 bit crypto
  • Re: If this thread didn't start with a flame then I'm ...
  • Re: Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Cypherpunks Purity Test
  • mailing list
  • Re: Bizdos citizenship?
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Precipice remailer open for business
  • Re: Brand e-cash implementation?
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Bizdos citizenship?
  • not a flame please re
  • Nice Guys
  • question about reputation
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Senate Bill 974?
  • RE: 64 bit crypto
  • IP6_pi2
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: Wearing RSA shirt to school
  • Senate Bill 974
  • Re: Senate Bill 974?
  • Re: IP6_pi2
  • NIS&T Key Escrow Export kangaroo conference
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: 64 bit crypto
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: not a flame please read and think about this
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Security Policy Documents
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: Document Fingerprinting
  • GAK Advisory Board
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: GAK Advisory Board
  • GAK Advisory Board 94
  • Re: Internet commerce mtg, Denver
  • Re: Document Fingerprinting
  • Re: Big machine ordered from Intel
  • Voice Encryption
  • question about reputa
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • FYI
  • Re: Internet commerce mtg, Denver
  • Information Security and Privacy in Network Environments (fwd)
  • Media coverage of NIST Export meetings?
  • Re: 64 bit crypto
  • Cryptography Technical Report Server: Bad URL
  • NYT on GAK
  • Re: Voice Encryption
  • Comp Sec Calendar
  • List of reliable remailers
  • e$: Progress and Freedom Conference this Summer
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: Clinton's Black Helicopters Over My House!
  • Clipper: the definitive meme
  • Re: Brian Davis' cypherpunk GAK proposal
  • VER_tgo
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: e$: Progress and Freedom Conference this Summer
  • Re: NYT on GAK
  • Re: NYT on GAK
  • NIST Hat Tricks
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • crypto confrontation
  • More NIST presentations available
  • itar question
  • Re: question about reputation
  • Re: itar question
  • Re: Media coverage of NIST Export meetings?
  • Re: Brand e-cash implementation?
  • Re: crypto confrontation
  • Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto available
  • Re: Brand e-cash implementation?
  • away from my mail
  • spam apology
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: spam apology
  • draft key mgmt props
  • PGP in UK - snooped as unSTEALTHed?
  • anyone got a cpunk URL for the UK munitions T?
  • Re: anyone got a cpunk URL for the UK munitions T?
  • Re: draft key mgmt props
  • Re: PGP in UK - snooped as unSTEALTHed?
  • Questions on PGP3.0
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • No Subject
  • VCR+ encode/decode source file error.
  • RE: 64 bit crypto
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: anyone got a cpunk URL for the UK munitions T?
  • NRO_puf
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • VOO_doo
  • Re: University logging mail to anon.penet
  • Re: PGP in UK - snooped as unSTEALTHed?
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto available
  • Netscape to patch shareware version
  • Re: Phil Zimmermann/Amnesty International?
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto available
  • Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto
  • Famous Zen koan: what is the sound of two shoes dropping?
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto available
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: Returned mail: User unknown
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Payment Systems
  • PGP duress code, and stego (was Re: PGP in UK - snooped unSTEALHed?)
  • Whitehouse responds to Zimmermann pardon letter
  • NIST conference summary in CDT
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto
  • Re: Netscape to patch shareware version
  • DC-C'punks meeting
  • Re: Netscape to patch shareware version
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Secure Device 1.4 (secdr14.zip)
  • Re: Netscape to patch shareware version
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: Netscape to patch shareware version
  • VOO_doo
  • Key Escrow as Law Enforcement's *Worst Nightmare*
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and (fwd)
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Friday (15 Sep) GAK meeting at NIST
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Leaked NSI PR About $50-Annual-Fee-for-Domain-Name
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and (fwd)
  • Denver area meeting, SUNDAY, 9/17, 2 pm
  • Re: Netscape to patch shareware version
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • new info-sec mailing list
  • No Subject
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • No Subject
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Public Key Crypto available
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • generating hash.curve in eliptic.src
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Mixmaster posting poll
  • Re: NYT on GAK
  • Community ConneXion & its new look
  • Whitehouse "dissident
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" and net monitoring
  • ADMIN: How to find out if you have been culled from the list
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • (NOISE) Re: White House MONITORS Web Pages !
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Majordomo results: (NOISE) Re: White House MONITORS Web Pag
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Dirty Jobs Ad
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • FUZ_fat
  • CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Recent articles
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" and net monitoring
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Software vs Money Laundering
  • Web Proxy Servers
  • An opportunity not to be missed
  • Dirty Pix Ad
  • Re: Software vs Money Laundering
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Can GAK be made "not interoperable" with PGP?
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Mixmaster posting poll
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: Can GAK be made "not interoperable" with PGP?
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Corporate Use of Anon WWW Proxies
  • Minor Risk to LSB Steganography
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Digital Cash on sci.crypt
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: Can GAK be made "not interoperable" with PGP?
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • CAGK rationale (was: Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?)
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and fails?
  • MOSS [IETF privacy-enhanced mail, modified for MIME] now available
  • Text tracking
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Factoring Software (fwd)
  • re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • MS-Word macros disassembler/cracker?
  • Re: Factoring Software (fwd)
  • "Who knows this guy?"
  • Re: Key Escrow as Law Enforcement's *Worst Nightmare*
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?
  • Ron Plesser's take on NIST GAK meeting
  • Re: Can GAK be made "not interoperable" with PGP?
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: CAGK rationale (was: Re: GAK/weak crypto rationale?)
  • [Meeting at Tim's house participant] Who wanted the AT&T UNIX for 8086/80286 ?
  • Need ideas. NFP to monitor law enforcement on the net.
  • NSA on GAK
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • (NOISE) Re: White House M
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • AOL Porno
  • Re: Software vs Money Laundering
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • WAS_tem
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Crimestoppers anon tip mailbox
  • Re: Mixmaster posting poll
  • Re: WAS_tem
  • Re: Scientology tries to break PGP - and
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Feeb Slants Feeb Slur
  • Re: WAS_tem
  • Re: WAS_tem
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • No Subject
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • No Subject
  • Crimestoppers anon tip mailbox
  • MIME Security Issues
  • Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • [NOISE] Alice's Remailer site (was:Re: Digital Fingerprinting)
  • Child Porn, Morphing, and Pointers
  • Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Child Porn, Morphing, and Pointers
  • Annonymous Web proxies.
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: MIME Security Issues
  • Re: Mixmaster posting poll
  • Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: AOL Porno
  • Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: [NOISE] Alice's Remailer site
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: An opportunity not to be missed
  • Things the LEAs don't want to admit.
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: MOSS [IETF privacy-enhanced mail, modified for MIME] now available
  • Corrections to "Ron Plesser's take on NIST GAK"
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Crimestoppers anon tip mailbox
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Mixmaster status changing
  • Privtool 0.85 Released
  • Re: [NOISE] Alice's Remailer site
  • Re: AOL Porno
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: <SAFER SK-xx>
  • Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Child Porn, Morphing, and Pointers
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Celco Sting
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: GAK
  • [NOISE] Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Celco Sting
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • RE: Mixmaster status
  • [non-crypto] Any info on Motorola Digital cell phone?
  • Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: PGP in UK - snooped as unSTEALTHed?
  • Check Cloning frenzy and attack on anonymous accounts
  • RE: Mixmaster status
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: DD, pedophiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
  • RE: Mixmaster status
  • Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Some informed comments on RSA's S/MIME
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • VIO_lat
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • RE: Mixmaster status
  • Chiffrement en Fr
  • Smart Cards, Credit cards, Payment systems
  • Loi Log
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Oct Byte - Wayner's article heh
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: DD, pedophiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • More on ECheques
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: NSA on GAK
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: More on ECheques
  • Re: More on ECheques (retry)
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • [[email protected]: Re: The owls are not what they seem]
  • No Subject
  • Applied Cryptography, Second Edition: Ordering Information
  • Crypto + Economics + AI = Digital Money Economies
  • Minutes of IEEE public-key standardization meeting
  • "Use implies consent to monitoring"
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • RE: Mixmaster status
  • San Diego Cypherpunks Physical Meeting
  • Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
  • ===>> FREE 1 yr. Magazine Sub sent worldwide- 315+ Popular USA Titles
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: SPAM bait
  • NTSC version BBC-4 show (cryptography/privacy)
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
  • laptop passwords
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK harmful. THE TRUTH IS TOLD
  • Re: "Use implies consent to monitoring"
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK harmful. THE TRUTH IS TOLD
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK harmful. THE TRUTH IS TOLD
  • Re: "Use implies consent to monitoring"
  • Re: why ecash is traceable
  • Picking the Crypto Locks
  • Re: why ecash is traceable
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK harmful. THE TRUTH IS TOLD
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Washington D.C. Cyperhpunks Meeting Cybercast
  • Quantum computing info?
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Re: Why ecash is traceable
  • Bad sig from Cypherpunk auto-signer Re: DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
  • Re: Quantum computing info?
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: e$: Progress and Freedom Conference this Summer
  • Re: laptop passwords
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • SecureDrive News - Win95 yes, Iomega zip drive no
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Web page
  • More on ECheques
  • Re: Quantum computing info?
  • HRT_web
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: "Use implies consent to monitoring"
  • Wash Post coverage of NIST Key escrow-export
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • (Noise) X-Files anarchist
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: More on ECheques
  • Re: (Noise) X-Files anarchist
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Arnold Bowker and John Joslin vs. Privacy
  • alt.cypherpunks
  • Re: (Noise) X-Files anarchist
  • Re: SPAM bait
  • Re: Digital Fingerprinting
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • (noise) Re: SPAM bait
  • "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • RE: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • cypherpunks as a newsgroup
  • Re: alt.cypherpunks
  • RE: Commercial Mixmaster
  • More on ECheques
  • Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
  • Re: SecureDrive News - Win95 yes, Iomega zip drive no
  • C-punks, marketing for the masses
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: cypherpunks as a newsgroup
  • Newbie Crypto question: MOD?
  • Re: SecureDrive News - Win95 yes, Iomega zip drive no
  • AOL monitoring
  • Rosing's Elliptic curve documentation question
  • [NOISE] Re: SecureDrive News - Win95 yes, Iomega zip drive no
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: cypherpunks as a newsgroup
  • All Online Lusers, cryptoTCP
  • RE: Commercial Mixmaster
  • "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Look, a *.cypherpunk group already exists!
  • Re: Quantum computing info?
  • Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: (noise) Re: SPAM bait
  • Re: Mixmaster status changing
  • RE: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • cypherpunks as a newsgroup
  • [ASSENT NOISE] Re: C-punks, marketing for the masses
  • Re: Newbie Crypto question: MOD?
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Mixmaster Licensing Offer Explained
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: [ASSENT NOISE] Re: C-punks, marketing for the masses
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Trained Seals and Beltway Insiders
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: Mixmaster Licensing Offer Explained
  • planning for life during the crypto night (was Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.)
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Intellectual Property and Crypto collision
  • cypherpunks as a newsgroup
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • "Attachments"
  • Re: Commercial Mixmaster
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: "Attachments"
  • Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
  • Re: "Attachments"
  • Friday's NIST Key Escrow FIPS Workshop
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: planning for life during the crypto night (was Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.)
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: FAX Encryption Software
  • Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  • Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Anonymous WWW proxy Alpha release available
  • Re: FAX Encryption Software
  • Central Banking for the 21st Century -- Thurs 28Sep, San Fran
  • Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation is broken!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation is broken!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Netscape Navigator 2.0 will implement secure e-mail
  • Re: Netscape Navigator 2.0 will implement secure e-mail
  • Re: Netscape Navigator 2.0 will implement secure e-mail
  • Jill Sixpack wants to know?
  • Re: Netscape Navigator 2.0 will implement secure e-mail
  • e$: New Ecash Shop
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxy Alpha release available
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Code of Law
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation is broken!
  • Good random seeds
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxy Alpha release available
  • Re: Code of Law
  • Netscape's random numbers
  • Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • Re: Netscape Navigator 2.0 will implement secure e-mail
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation cracked!
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • ftp://www.brooks.af.mil/pub/unix/utils/des.tar
  • Re: Netscape's random numbers
  • Re: ftp://www.brooks.af.mil/pub/unix/utils/des.tar
  • Re: Intellectual Property and Crypto collision
  • Re: Netscape SSL implementation is broken!
  • Re: Code of Law
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: ftp://www.brooks.af.mil/pub/unix/utils/des.tar
  • Re: (noise) Re: SPAM bait
  • Re: Netscape's random numbers
  • RSAREF Commercial Licensing
  • information on SSL brute force hacks wanted
  • Re: Netscape's random numbers
  • unssl.c available for ftp (was: Netscape's random numbers)
  • Good random seeds
  • Time release crypto
  • Re: Code of Law ["Noise"]
  • VeriSign Introduces the First Digital ID Issuing Service
  • Re: Netscape's random numbers
  • Your name in print
  • Re: unssl.c available for ftp (was: Netscape's random numbers)
  • Re: Time release crypto
  • Caribbean Internet Services?
  • Caribbean Internet Services? (fwd)
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services?
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services?
  • NYT on Netscape SSL Crack
  • Vince Cate is Breathing ;-)
  • Hack Netscape!
  • Re: Hack Netscape!
  • PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION OFFERS REWARD FOR EXPOSING ENCRYPTION FLAWS
  • John Young You are KEWL!
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services? (fwd)
  • Re: Hack Netscape!
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Hurricane Luis in Anguilla / Cellphone Antenna
  • NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Musings
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Good random seeds
  • Brute Force and Smart Force
  • Re: Hurricane Luis in Anguilla / Cellphone Antenna
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Bidzos takes advantage of Netscape hole!
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • FC's Opus
  • NSA and Netscape Crack (Re: NYT on Netscape Crack)
  • Re: Brute Force and Smart Force
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • taxonomies of 'real money' and e-cash
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • FC's Opus
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: taxonomies of 'real money' and e-cash
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services?
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Re: PGP for Linux 1.2.8
  • Automatic E-Mail
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Brute Force and Smart Force
  • Re: VeriSign Introduces the First Digital ID Issuing Service
  • Re: Automatic E-Mail
  • Re: MIME attachments and ranting.
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services? (fwd)
  • Re: Time release crypto
  • Fundamental Netscape hack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Quick ITAR question....
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: taxonomies of 'real money' and e-cash
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Errors in Applied Cryptography, 2nd Edition
  • Unabomber ?
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Time release crypto
  • (Yet Another?) Netscape Crack Web page
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • articles
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services?
  • Re: Fundamental Netscape hack
  • Re: ftp://www.brooks.af.mil/pub/unix/utils/des.tar
  • Re: Intellectual Property and Crypto collision
  • Re: Unabomber ?
  • Cypherpunks Hold a Cracking Party
  • Re: (Yet Another?) Netscape Crack Web page
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • WebSTAR "challenge"
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Fundamental Netscape hack
  • SFChron
  • Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Random publicity was: articles
  • Re: Explaining Zero Knowledge to your children
  • Why Surveillance State Needs Toy Crypto
  • Investing on Information We Get Here
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Avoiding weak IDEA keys?
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • unabomber paper
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: (Yet Another?) Netscape Crack Web page
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • ASCII unabomber paper attribution and FTP address
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Crypto Sync Issue
  • Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: ASCII unabomber paper attribution and FTP address
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack (Re: NYT on Netscape Crack)
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Re: Caribbean Internet Services? (yes!)
  • Re: Random publicity was: articles
  • netscape broken on NPR
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Investing on Information We Get Here
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • SUP_con
  • Cylink
  • Financial Services Technology Consortium
  • Re: ASCII unabomber paper attribution and FTP address (fwd)
  • Una FTPaper 2
  • Netscape responds.
  • Re: Netscape's random numbers
  • Re: Cylink
  • Re: Cylink
  • NetManage - Cylink Press Announcement
  • A Netscape Server implementation error
  • netscape's response
  • Re: Unabomber ?
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • http://www.c2.org/hacknetscape/critique.phtml
  • Re: Crypto + Economics + AI = Digital Money Economies
  • New Kid On The Block
  • Re: ftp://www.brooks.af.mil/pub/unix/utils/des.tar
  • Re: A Netscape Server implementation error
  • Re: unssl.c available for ftp (was: Netscape's random numbers)
  • Public Key Partners Dissolved!!!!!
  • Netscape on randseed issue
  • Change of address {No crypto content}
  • Stand up and be heard!
  • Re: Anonymous WWW proxies
  • WWW: Unabomber Manifesto
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: Scientology and police visit XS4ALL Amsterdam
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: SFChron
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • http://www.osf.org/~rsalz/unabomber
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Not Crypto: Referencing Electronic Texts
  • FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • response to netscape's press release
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • PGP back in legal limbo?
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Commercial RSAref
  • [NOISE] Unabomber - crypto-anarchist?!?
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • My Day
  • Re: WWW: Unabomber Manifesto
  • Re: "Hackers"-- brief review and anecdote...
  • Re: Verification of Random Number Generators
  • Re: [NOISE] Unabomber - crypto-anarchist?!?
  • Re: PGP back in legal limbo? [noise]
  • Re: [NOISE] Unabomber - crypto-anarchist?!?
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: netscape broken on NPR
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Investing on Information We Get Here
  • Netscape closes UNCHANGED!
  • MIME
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: Investing on Information We Get Here
  • Netscape sub rosa?
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: SSL implementation problem at Netscape
  • Re: [NOISE] Unabomber - crypto-anarchist?!?
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: netscape's response
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION CORRECTS INACCURACIES IN NETSCAPE PRESS RELEASE
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: netscape's response
  • C'Punks meet the T*'s, T*'s meet the C'Punks!
  • Re: response to netscape's press release
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: Investing on Information We Get Here
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: C'Punks meet the T*'s, T*'s meet the C'Punks!
  • Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: My Day
  • Re: SSL implementation problem at Netscape
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: My Day
  • Re: My Day
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Conference: WORLDWIDE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
  • `Random' seed.
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: Cylink
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: Cylink
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Netscape sub rosa?
  • Banks and Netscape InSec
  • Re: Cylink
  • Re: netscape's response
  • USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • [NOISE] Re: Cylink
  • Re: My Day
  • No Subject
  • Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered In Software Used in Shopping
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • Cypherpunks Press release
  • drand48() bug
  • Munitions shirt (again)
  • Re: Time release crypto
  • RSA Prevails In Arbitration Against Cylink
  • Re: My Day
  • Silly NetScape RND tricks...
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: MIME
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Why couldn't it have been 42?
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • No Subject
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Re: My Day
  • Hypermail gateway
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: My Day
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • Re: My Day
  • Re: [NOISE] Unabomber - crypto-anarchist?!?
  • MacRandoms
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: RSA Prevails In Arbitration Against Cylink
  • Announce: Private Idaho beta release
  • Re: Cypherpunks Hold a Cracking Party
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • netscape bug
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • MD5 in Eudora
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • My new perspective on ITAR (was Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • Re: Netscape sub rosa?
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • A message from Joe Six-Pack
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
  • "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • PKP Lawsuit Settled: Both Sides Claim Victory
  • MacRandoms
  • software
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Re: My new perspective on ITAR (was Re: Munitions shirt (again))
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered In Software Used in Shopping)
  • French Navy Security Compromised (Current by Shallow)
  • Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: netscape's response
  • netscpe will release code?
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: RSA Prevails In Arbitration Against Cylink
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • SCIENCE magazine on computers
  • software
  • Re: Whitehouse "dissident" and net monitoring
  • ASN.1 AND KERBEROS VERSION 5
  • RE: CRYPTOGRAPHY ELIMINATES LAWYERS?
  • SMART CARDS, CREDIT CARDS, PAYMENT SYSTEMS
  • PHIL ZIMMERMANN/AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL?
  • No Subject
  • NIST ESCROW PAPERS - NOW WEB AVAILABLE
  • Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • RE: BIZDOS CITIZENSHIP?
  • Clipper: the definitive meme
  • Re: www.commentary.unabomber
  • RE: NETSCAPE TO PATCH SHAREWARE VERSION
  • (NOISE) X-FILES ANARCHIST
  • RE: GAK
  • Selling our spin. was: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: netscape's response
  • RE: AN OPPORTUNITY NOT TO BE MISSED
  • Spam of c'punks list: cleaning it up now.
  • Random Number State
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: MIME
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Re: first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered In Software Used in Shopping)
  • Euro-Clipper
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • Re: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered In Software Used in Shopping)
  • Netscape Servers too ? (forwarded message from Marc VanHeyningen)
  • /dev/random for Linux
  • Re: /dev/random for Linux
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: AOL monitoring
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: Silly NetScape RND tricks...
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: Cypherpunks Hold a Cracking Party
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • What's with the list? (Old mail?!)
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • Netscape is doing well -- give 'em a break.
  • Entropy vs Random Bits
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: Euro-Clipper
  • [NOISE] "hacker" was: first virtual "security"
  • Re: (none)
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • RE: Patents and trade secrets
  • Re: (none)
  • Re: Netscape is doing well -- give 'em a break.
  • Re: Entropy vs Random Bits
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets
  • Re: netscape's response (source code review)
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: (none)
  • Re: Entropy vs Random Bits
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Export via FTP: who's to blame? Ask a court!
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • What's with the list? (Ol
  • Re: netscape's response
  • Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: Cybersecurity
  • Seeds which depend on machine states
  • Fraud Fraut Froth
  • Re: Fraud Fraut Froth
  • Re: first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered InSoftware Used in Shopping)
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . .
  • Canada & ITAR
  • Re: USA Today on Fear of Credit Cards over Net
  • PRNG state (and conditioning) (was Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: Export via FTP: who's to blame? Ask a court!
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: RSA Prevails In Arbitration Against Cylink
  • XDM has the same problem as netscape ?!
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: Netscape is doing well -- give 'em a break.
  • Re: [NOISE] "hacker" was: first virtual "security"
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . . (the joys of boating)
  • Re: Entropy vs Random Bits
  • Re: Fraud Fraut Froth
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Fraud Fraut Froth
  • Council of Europe proposes to outlaw strong encryption (fwd)
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . . (or the joys of boating)
  • Persistent Services Needed
  • Re: FROM A FRIEND . . . (the joys of boating)
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Euro-Clipper
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: netscape's response (source code review)
  • Re: Persistent Services Needed
  • Has anyone seen the CatMan (catburgler)?
  • The Next Hack
  • Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: NSA and Netscape Crack
  • Re: Please send me SSL prob
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: MIME
  • Fraud Can Flourish Without the Internet
  • economic espionage (@#$%^&*)
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • Prosecution of Cracking Security Systems
  • "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • [NOISE] Re: NYT on Netscape Crack
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Cryptography book source
  • Crypto *import* ban?
  • real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • netscape bug
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Anyone for testing MOSS?
  • Re: XDM has the same problem as netscape ?!
  • Netscape to end Linux support?
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*)
  • Pitfall in producing random numbers
  • Re: Seeds which depend on machine states
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Re: Munitions shirt (again)
  • RE: Prosecution of Cracking Security Systems
  • Re: first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered InSoftware Used in Shopping)
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • Re: real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*)
  • Was the Netscape Flaw Over-Publicized?
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft (fwd)
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*) (fwd)
  • Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • Cypherpunks, Sun and JAVA
  • Netscape RNG
  • Miami FL key signing
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Re: Netscape RNG
  • /dev/audio RNG
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*) (fwd)
  • NSCP: Unch..vol rises...morn selling
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Fraud Fraut Froth
  • Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Netscape bug update
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Mosaic Bug (same as Netscape bug) (was Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Re: economic espionage (@#$%^&*)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Netscape Server Attacks
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: Mosaic Bug (same as Netscape bug) (was Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Arena as well (was: Netscape Bug)
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Weak Keys in RC4
  • Re: Netscape to end Linux support?
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • RNG Resource FAQ (was Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape)
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Netscape bug update
  • Re: first virtual "security" (!!) (was Re: Security Flaw Is Discovered InSoftware Used in Shopping)
  • Re: Netscape bug update
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE HOLE!
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • e$: Non-Repudiation
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!
  • SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Council of Europe proposes to outlaw strong encryption (fwd)
  • No Subject
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Seeds which depend on machine states
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Munition (RSA/Perl) T-shirts Now Shipping From Stock!
  • new source of PGP sourcecode
  • Executing code on the stack, was Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Reformatted Weak Keys in RC4 for readability.
  • Defense against a class of programming bugs
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • (noise) Subject: Married with Children (was: Re: Netscape closes up 1 3/8 today!)
  • business intelligence or BI
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • YET ANOTHER BAD NETSCAPE BUG (no it isnt!)
  • Netscape for Linux?
  • Netscape bug and the IMG tag.
  • Re: XDM has the same problem as netscape ?!
  • Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Crypto Sync Issue
  • Worms and New Netscape Bug
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: Netscape sub rosa?
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Netscape for Linux
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
  • Re: /dev/random for Linux
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • ip: Freeh: Kiddie Porn was Encrypted (fwd)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Netscape to end Linux support?
  • 2 new MixMasters
  • MS Word Virus
  • Re: netscape bug
  • test
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: Netscape sub rosa?
  • RE: RNG Resource FAQ (was Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape)
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: Pitfall in producing random numbers
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • "Going after Netscape"
  • WordBasic and other macro languages
  • Notes security question
  • More on "Entropy"
  • Re: Council of Europe proposes to outlaw strong encryption (fwd)
  • T-Shirt Spams
  • another net phone (crypto)
  • speak freely
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • The Fortezza random number generator is not trustworthy
  • Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • No Subject
  • SecureDrive/Secure Device News
  • No Subject
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • 500m.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.foo.
  • No Subject
  • (Fwd) Netscape Commerce Server and Certificates
  • Re: Seeds which depend on machine states
  • Re: Council of Europe proposes to outlaw strong encryption (fwd)
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • Re: Seeds which depend on machine states
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • MacRandoms
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • ? Me?
  • Step One: We admitted
  • Re:
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Seattle Cypherpunks
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: "Going after Netscape"
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • Why I haven't begun to be nasty to Netscape (was Re: The Next Hack)
  • macworld crypto articles
  • Re: "Going after Netscape"
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: HEY!!! WAS: The Next Hack
  • Re: The Next Hack
  • Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: The Fortezza random number generator is not trustworthy
  • Need Pathfinder "Cypherpunks" password
  • Important Announcement from Money & Investing Update
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Hello
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Cypherpunks Lite
  • Re: Cypherpunks Lite
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Apology to Netscape.
  • Amazon.com Books -- personal notification service
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Amazon.com Books -- personal notification service (fwd)
  • Found on usenet: ACLU -- "Big Brother and the power of the Net"
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Kerberos
  • Entropy VI: "Shannon's Choice" (with apologies to Wm. Styron)
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Kerberos
  • Piggybacking
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • change of address notice for Marc Donner
  • Re: "Going after Netscape"
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Lynx (or approx for Windows)?
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • Snake Oil (was: macworld crypto article)
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Crypto in Wired
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • Netscape giving away T-shirts?
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: Cybersecurity
  • No Subject
  • Important consequence of existence of compromised Netscape certificates
  • Re: Crypto in Wired
  • Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • No Subject
  • What version of PGP?
  • Re: Defense against a class of programming bugs
  • John Deutsch
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in
  • Re: John Deutsch
  • Re: real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • Colin Powell coming to Dallas
  • secure file system for Linux?
  • Re: What version of PGP?
  • Re: secure file system for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • New Netscape RNG
  • Re: secure file system for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape giving away T-shirts?
  • No Subject
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: secure file system for Linux?
  • Re: New Netscape RNG
  • Phil Karn's legal case is filed; here's the Complaint.
  • ANNOUNCE: Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0 available for 10 cyberbucks
  • Net Gambling on CNN
  • Re: Decompiling Netscape
  • Re: "Gnusaic"? Why not a Gnu-Style Web Browser?
  • Re: Crypto in Wired
  • New remailer now active.
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in
  • RSA/Cylink arbitration agreement on-line
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Netscape flaw hits the big time
  • WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • (Another) WSJ article
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Key signing at Miami Convention
  • JAV_jiv
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Electronic Commerce
  • Re: Persistent Services Needed
  • Netscape as vehicle for cypherpunk agenda/the cypherpunk bully pulpit
  • Re: Defense against a class of programming bugs
  • List of US representitives
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Notes security question
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: CyberAngels
  • Re: Persistent Services Needed
  • PM's Netscape rant
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: netscape bug
  • Re: List of US representitives
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Article in 9/25 Computerworld about Netscape
  • Re: Notes security question
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Netscape as vehicle for cypherpunk agenda/the cypherpunk bully pulpit
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: PM's Netscape rant
  • Re: PM's Netscape rant
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV
  • Security Update news release
  • Re: `Random' seed.
  • RE: More on "Entropy"
  • RE: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • The Law of ElectronicCommerce: EDI, E-mail and Internet
  • Re: New Netscape RNG
  • Re: Primality verification needed
  • Suspicious Action Reports
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • NYT on Nscp Flaw 3
  • Mixmaster Remailer FAQ
  • Netscape for OS/2, when? (Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • RE: More on "Entropy"
  • Re: Please send me SSL problems...
  • Hack Microsoft?
  • ADMIN: Sudden CP Vacation, rest up while you can...
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • truerand
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • getting netscape to support the remailers
  • Re: RSA/Cylink arbitration agreement on-line
  • Re: Decompiling Netscape
  • Re: List of US representitives
  • Re: Net KiddiePorn Hype on TV
  • Re: "random" number seeds vs. Netscape
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Primality verification needed
  • Re: SSL Man-in-the-middle
  • Fax Number List
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Fax Number List
  • Easter Eggs
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Archives current again
  • Insecurity in WWW oriented security
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • RE: More on "Entropy"
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list
  • "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • SpokesPunking...
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • Re: Easter Eggs
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • Re: Hack Microsoft NT C2 Rating?
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • First Payments WG Meeting Announcement
  • Re: real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • [NOISE] Re: Easter Eggs
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • IBE_dam
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • Re: First Payments WG Meeting Announcement
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Netscape Stock Prices
  • [More NOISE] Re: Netscape for OS/2, when? (Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • cypherpunk press releases vs. FAQ
  • RE: More on "Entropy"
  • RE: `Random' seed.
  • RE: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Cypherpunks Lite
  • Banks eyeball sci-fi style identification for ATMs
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: The Fortezza random number generator is not trustworthy
  • Internet draft on MIME/PGP
  • Re: real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Re: real randomness for netscape - user clicking mouse
  • Re: Netscape for OS/2, when? (Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list
  • weak links in DigiCash system
  • Re: cypherpunk press releases vs. FAQ
  • Windows MixMaster Client
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Re: Netscape Stock Prices
  • (fwd) FBI COMPUTER FRAUD WEB SITE DIVISION
  • Re: New Netscape RNG
  • Re: Netscape as vehicle for cypherpunk agenda/the cypherpunk bully pulpit
  • CHA_cha
  • Re: Netscape as vehicle for cypherpunk agenda/the cypherpunk bully pulpit
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list: YES!! DO IT!!
  • Status of Netscape Bug Exploit (suggestions needed)
  • Time Keys, Some Secure Ideas (by Alias: Jay Hyden)
  • PGP and FBI?
  • chaos cryptography
  • Fax encryption software
  • Re: Yet Another Alarmist TV Show About Child Molesters on the Ne
  • Re: chaos cryptography
  • Coercion-proof remailers (solved?)
  • Re: Yet Another Alarmist TV Show About Child Molesters on the Ne
  • Re: Fax encryption software
  • Wild Idea for RNG
  • Re: Windows MixMaster Client
  • Re: Coercion-proof remailers (solved?)
  • Re: Cypherpunks Lite
  • Hack Microsoft At Work Fax?
  • Re: netscape NSRANDFILE compatible with /dev/random ?
  • netscape NSRANDFILE compatible with /dev/random ?
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Easter Eggs
  • testab
  • testab
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • Re: cypherpunks press releases/contact list
  • HP KEscrew
  • SSTarget
  • Re: Netscape Stock Prices
  • Re: Wild Idea for RNG
  • NO weak links in DigiCash system!!!
  • FT on NsCPunxsters
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Hegel
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Easter Eggs
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • Re: PGP and FBI?
  • Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?
  • Re: Netscape for OS/2, when? (Re: Another Netscape Bug)
  • Re: NO weak links in DigiCash system!!!
  • Re: Status of Netscape Bug Exploit (suggestions needed)
  • [ PROPOSED NEW STANDARD ] "I-like-encrypted-mail" tag
  • Re: The Fortezza random number generator is not trustworthy
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Easter Eggs
  • RE: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Re: PGP and FBI?
  • Re: Hack Microsoft?
  • Re: getting netscape to support the remailers
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • It's Wednesday
  • Re: PGP and FBI?
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Microsoft & new Internet Security specs
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: Exchange random numbers (was: Re: netscape's response)
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: macworld crypto articles
  • (fwd) CYLINK Q&A on PKP Arbitration Decision
  • Re: Re: NO weak links ...
  • Re: Fax encryption software
  • Sorry or something
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: Hack Microsoft NT C2 Rating?
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: Easter Eggs
  • Re: JCrypt (was: getting netscape to support the remailers)
  • Schnorr patent
  • Re: Insecurity in WWW oriented security
  • [Q] Checkfree Wallet
  • Re: alpha.c2.org nymserver
  • X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • Re: Time Keys, Some Secure Ideas (by Alias: Jay Hyden)
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • Re: Golden Coy Freeh
  • Re: Security Update news release
  • re: chaos cryptography
  • Re: Netscape for Linux?
  • Re: First Payments WG Meeting Announcement
  • weak links in the cyberbucks demo (was: weak links in DigiCash system)
  • Information, We want information
  • Re: Microsoft & new Internet Security specs
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Patch release of Netscape available
  • Re: [ PROPOSED NEW STANDARD ] "I-like-encrypted-mail" tag
  • NIS library code exposure
  • Re: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: Patch release of Netscape available
  • Looking for advice.
  • Re: Patch release of Netscape available
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Netscape seems to fix the overflow bug
  • Re: WSJ on Netscape Hole 3
  • Re: It's Wednesday
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Problems with netscape patch and W95
  • Mathematics Library Plus -- Interactive Math Tutorial (fwd)
  • No Subject
  • No Subject
  • No Subject
  • Re: NIS library code exposure (Unix network exposure)
  • No Subject
  • Re: X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • Re: NIS library code exposure (Unix network exposure)
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: Looking for advice.
  • No Subject
  • Re: It's Wednesday
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: It's Wednesday
  • STT_???
  • Re: Hack Microsoft NT C2 Rating?
  • Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • 25 Crays a Year to Break STT
  • Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results
  • 2nd notice - IEEE Symp on Security and Privacy - Call for papers
  • Hack Microsoft
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • european version of EFF/EPIC/etc?
  • Re: european version of EFF/EPIC/etc?
  • Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security hole)
  • Re: STT_???
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • awards for hacking microsoft
  • [NOISE] Java
  • sled corp
  • Re: Prvasoft FAX Encryption Software
  • Re: Netscape as vehicle for cypherpunk agenda/the cypherpunk bully pulpit
  • Re: 25 Crays a Year to Break STT
  • FSTC - What is it...
  • Re: Timothy C. May: Mini-mailbombs and Warning Letters
  • Re: awards for hacking microsoft
  • Q&A on the RSA/Cylink legal dispute
  • Anon Http web Proxy V2.1
  • Re: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?
  • RE: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Re: STT_???
  • Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • RE: More on "Entropy"
  • NPR reports on Digital Express Secure Telephone
  • Re: 2^25 Crays a Year to Break STT
  • Re: awards for hacking microsoft
  • Re: 25 Crays a Year to Break STT
  • Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • VISA and Microsoft STT Specs available
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Netscape and privacy
  • worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Re: worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Re: Q&A on the RSA/Cylink legal dispute
  • Re: Netscape and privacy
  • Re: worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • GSSAPI compliant Apps
  • Re: Netscape and privacy
  • Re: GSSAPI compliant Apps
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Re: awards for hacking microsoft
  • No Subject
  • 53 of the FAX No's. are GOOD!
  • Re: Ray Cromwell: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security (fwd)
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • [NOISE] Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • No Subject
  • Re: your mail
  • Cypherpunks Fax Service
  • Re: SpokesPunking...
  • Re: cypherpunk press releases vs. FAQ
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION TO OFFER REWARD FOR HACKING MICROSOFT
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results (Repeat)
  • Re: Q&A on the RSA/Cylink legal dispute
  • screensavers and idle computation.
  • FinCen Blurb in local paper
  • Assessing Netscape Commerce Server Risk
  • Re: worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Re: netscape NSRANDFILE compatible with /dev/random ?
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Traveling abroad with laptops
  • Re: Hack Microsoft
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • COE Document
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Re: Hack Microsoft
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results (Repeat)
  • Re: Q&A on the RSA/Cylink legal dispute
  • Info War Comes Home
  • "Who shall speak for us?"
  • HP Lobbies for Exportable Crypto
  • Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  • RE: Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results (Repeat)
  • Re: VISA and Microsoft STT Specs available
  • This fax list is 95% accurate!
  • STT is 40-bit for RC4, 56-bit for DES
  • Re: Info War Comes Home
  • Re: "Who shall speak for us?"
  • Re: Anon Http web Proxy V2.1
  • (Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper
  • SOFTWARE: Filtering ads out of popular web sites
  • Re: worldwide announce: New OTP Mail/FTP apps
  • Call for IT Sec XX
  • SKIp
  • Elementrix Press Release
  • Re: SKIp
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Web "places" and the media monsters
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Electronic junk mail
  • RSA's comments on RC4 weak keys
  • Re: Electronic junk mail (one solution)
  • Yet Another "(Fwd) Internet Euro-Clipper"
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • ESM under ULTRIX?
  • Re: SAIC bought InterNic, but who is SAIC? A spook contractor!
  • Export/import of chips
  • Re: Netscape hole without .Xauthority (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape "random" number seed generator code available
  • Re: Hack Microsoft
  • Murdering Electronic junk mailers *should* be legal. Nuking thei
  • Re: X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • Re: "alt.cypherpunks" Newsgroup vs. Mailing List?
  • Re: Electronic junk mail
  • Re:
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: X.509, S/MIME, and evolution of PGP
  • Re: [[email protected]: Re: The owls are not what they seem]
  • Re: Cryptanalysis of RC4 - Preliminary Results (Repeat)
  • RTR-3 Package/Bomb Inspection System
  • Computer Misuse Detection System
  • SAIC Acquires Network Solutions
  • SAIC Shows Crime-Fighting Technology
  • SAIC's FBI ID System
  • SAIC in VA
  • SAIC in MD
  • SAIC Global Web
  • SAIC in CA
  • SAIC Directors
  • SAIC in DC
  • Re: Operation Stop The Aliens
  • Re: Ray Cromwell: Another Netscape Bug (and possible security (fwd)
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Electronic junk mail
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • Re: Crypto hardware (was: Using sound cards to accelerate RSA?)
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Cypherpunks Press release
  • A new tack on breaking SSL streams and NetScape servers
  • NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: COE Document
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • my favorite random-numbers-in-software package (unix)
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • The 4th Estate
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: Operation Stop The Aliens
  • Re: my favorite random-numbers-in-software package (unix)
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Auto-signing
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: my favorite random-numbers-in-software package (unix)
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: Simple Hardware RNG Idea
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: "Notes" to be Eclipsed by "Netscape"
  • Re: Operation Stop The Aliens
  • Digests No Longer Available
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • Re: NetScape's dependence upon RSA down for the count!
  • WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: WHERE did this come from?
  • Re: List latency.
  • Re: The Free Speech Implications of Remailers
  • No Subject

  • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.3