[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cryptography eliminates lawyers?
On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, Jim Ray wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Brian Davis wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >Just wondering about liability issues after state accrediting is dead.
>
> <snip>
>
> <I can resist jumping in no longer...>
>
> Despite loud squawking, "chaos" will not ensue. Instead, the private
> sector will take over assesing risk, which it has always done better.
>
> An example: I'd rather jump into a full bathtub with a plugged-in,
> UL [Underwriter's Laboratories] certified TV set than take the FDA
> approved (but very dangerous, IMO) prostate drug called "Proscar."
> While there is only one UL (by choice, not force) and only one FDA
> (by force, not choice) I can easily imagine a lawyer-certifying
> companies like UL for appliances, probably tied [like UL] to the
> insurance industry. [I am not a lawyer, or a doctor either.]
> JMR
Last I checked, FDA, UL, or state bar association approval does not
*require* you to take, use, or hire the approved drug, toaster or lawyer.
Market forces are still at work, albeit in a filtered environment.
Just a first cut. And even that can usually be gotten around.
EBD