[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linking = Showing = Transferring?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <v02130501ac7e53505548@[18.157.1.107]>,
[email protected] (Joseph Sokol-Margolis) wrote:
>Here's my question, and a thought to ponder: If it is/becomes illegal to
>have links on a homepage to pornography because it is ruled as the same as
>having the pornography there; then can you have links to pages with links
>(the same as having it) to pornography? This repeats, so would it be legal
>to links at all?
The answer is trivial. If it pisses of the fascists in power enough, you
go to jail or get killed.
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:[email protected]>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMFjNIyoZzwIn1bdtAQFtXQGAkgf19PR9xYU91knoFXfYCR5NaPyWCcPz
BfpmmPksdMUFCk73R4rMJIc+LruHQGb9
=2aYL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----