[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WAS_tem (fwd)



Incoming from Rev. Ben:
> 
> On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
> 
> > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
> 
> Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child 
[snip]
> 
> Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?

	On cypherpunks?!?  Whatever for?  I imagine there's already a
rousing discussion going on about this somewhere in AOL.  Take it there.

-- 

 "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident;  it's an art form!" 
   [email protected]       s. keeling,   aecl - whiteshell labs