[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, S. Keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Rev. Ben:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
> >
> > > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
> >
> > Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
> [snip]
> >
> > Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
The current child pornography laws are entirely misguided and poorly written.
> --
>
> "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!"
> [email protected] s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs
>
---
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information