[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
From: [email protected] (Jeff Weinstein)
Date: 28 Sep 1995 22:57:14 GMT
Distribution: world
Newsgroups: mcom.list.cypherpunks
Organization: Netscape Communications Corp.
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Adam Shostack) writes:
> This came across the SSL mailing list.  Anyone know Taher's position
> on key-escrow?

  Just because we may do fortezza support for customers who want it
does not mean that we will force key escrow on the rest of the world.
I for one am against any kind of GAK on moral grounds.  I also think
that trying to implement mandatory GAK in a software only system
would be a nightmare.

	--Jeff

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
[email protected] - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.

References:
- Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
  - From: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 25 Crays a Year to Break STT
Next by Date: VISA and Microsoft STT Specs available
Prev by thread: Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
Next by thread: Re: Netscpae & Fortezza (Or, say it Ain't so, Jeff?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread