[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scientology/Wollersheim as test case for key disclosure
For some reason I think it was French, but I don't
have a citation either. But I think you're right.
MacN
On Sat, 9 Sep 1995, Michael Froomkin wrote:
> Ah. but if there is no plaintext, the question is whether you comply
> with the rule by providing the encrypted text rather than plaintext. I
> would say you have to provide the plaintext in the absence of a legitimate
> privilege claim, but I don't recall a case to this effect (there is
> precedent for requiring translation of foreign language documents when
> the request is covered by an evidence conention; I don't recall if there
> are any such cases that fall purely under domestic US rules). Anyone have
> chapter and verse?
>
>
> A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
> Associate Professor of Law | [email protected]
> U. Miami School of Law |
> P.O. Box 248087 | It's hot here. And humid.
> Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA |
> See (soon to move to its real home): http://www.law.miami.edu/~mfroomki
>
>