Re: Project: a standard cell random number generator

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>]

On this same track, I suggest that "/dev/random" devices for unix are
an excellent idea. Ted Tso did one for Linux that steals all the bits
of semi-random timing information it can. Such a driver has the
feature that it can be plugged into either a software pseudodriver or
a hardware device if one is available.

John Gilmore writes:
> Do we know any solid state physics / circuit design experts who think
> this might be a fun thing to do?  I bet you could get a paper out of
> it.  And probably improve the world a few years later, when companies
> used your paper to close another hole in their computer security.

There are companies that sell hardware RNGs -- Newbridge, for instance
-- but they charge an arm and a leg for them.

There is also a company that I got literature from that sells RS232
interfaceable radiation detectors, which I have thought about using
for this purpose, but they are also way too expensive.

As you say, what one really needs is something that fits in a small
section of a chip. Unfortunately, this stuff is very delicate analog
-- not the usual thing you find in standard cell -- and very easy to
screw up.

> PS: It's possible that NSA collusion with chip-makers could produce
> bad pseudo-random-number generators in popular chips, giving NSA a
> back-door into any algorithm that used them.  This would be harder to
> detect than poor software random number generators, since it requires
> prying the lid off the chip, getting out your microscope, and
> reverse-engineering the circuit, instead of just disassembling the
> software.  In this sense, NSA ought to be *encouraging* Intel and
> IBM and Motorola to put "generate random bits" instructions into
> their instruction sets...

An interesting concept!

Perry