[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.

To: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 19:20:49 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 18:39:44 EDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Black Unicorn writes:
> > > Some months ago I called for advanced stego and stealth PGP as well as 
> > > larger keys in the event we all had to go "into the crypto closet" for a 
> > > time.
> > 
> > > I call for them again.

> On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, Greg Broiles wrote:
> > (I've been "calling for" a big house with a hot tub for years now.
> > Still no progress. I'll let you know if it works out.)

Black Unicorn writes:
> Cute, but that's about all.

I think the problem is that those of us in a position to build them
don't really believe that they will solve the problem and thus are
spending our time on other matters.

Perry

References:
- Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
  - From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Friday's NIST Key Escrow FIPS Workshop
Next by Date: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
Prev by thread: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
Next by thread: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread