[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Child Porn, Morphing, and Pointers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <ac7db05202021004bc61@[205.199.118.202]>, [email protected]
(Timothy C. May) wrote:
>>If I'm reading this correctly, if I Photoshop a kids face onto the body
>>of the latest Playboy centerfold, I'm in violation of this proposed law?
>
>I believe there have already been prosecutions along these lines. For
>example, do you think a _comic book_ with child porn themes ("explicit"
>art, situations) would not be prosecuted as child porn?
>
>I strongly suspect that a _painting_ of a 7-year-old girl engaged in a sex
>act would result in a prosecution.
Any cites?
- --
- -- Lucky Green <mailto:[email protected]>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMFjEkSoZzwIn1bdtAQFO5gGAvKEwd8DuWbNAzMtkqQ4BCPrp5YAOWrcu
eSooY922jvZlXV+PYFcamevbR3mZ4bYj
=Jxeu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----