[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GAK
As I said, phones are inherently tappable--going
upstream to the switch must makes it easier to do
and harder to detect. This doesn't force the
conclusion that, if people speak in code on the
phone, they have to give the gov't the key.
MacN
On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, Lucky Green wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> (David G. Koontz) wrote:
>
>
> >While not every telephone, every telephone switch is required
> >to be tap capable - The Digital Telephony Act. Note there is
> >provision for the government to pay costs for Telcos to make
> >their phones tappable - as yet unfunded by Congress.
>
> Most telephones can be used to monitor conversations in the room they are
> installed in even while on-hook. No need to ever enter the premises. Just
> drive it with AC. Look at your basic telephone diagram and remember
> Xc=1/(omega*C) from your AC circuits class.
>
> - --
> - -- Lucky Green <mailto:[email protected]>
> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
> - ---
> [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
> means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
> signature and forwarded.]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
>
> iQBFAwUBMFjO4yoZzwIn1bdtAQFmjwGAwMA+G0nO0m/lmYeqPJEsC5NJNLvS5cYk
> +cMaVSJb+Kwk6+uywu8v088Ih8Nz7uo9
> =elV9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>