Re: ECPA (Was: University logging mail to anon.penet.fi)

[keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca (S. Keeling)]

Incoming from Jim Ray:
> "Josh M. Osborne" <stripes@va.pubnix.com> writes:
> 
> >down somewhat, in a very libertarian society oyu might be able to
> >run a profatable ISP selling to the very nich market of people who
> >want to threten, harass, or generally make a nuicence of themselves).
> 
> As the list's designated "very libertarian" advocate, I must object.
> Here is what you must sign to become a member of the Libertarian Party:

	And here, I must object (sorry Perry; I'll be brief).

	Whatever do the workings of an hypothetical "libertarian"
society have to do with the "Libertarian Party"?  Certainly, it would
be nice if the latter were working towards the former, but the two are
not the same.

	I know of quite a few `l'ibertarians who strongly object to
the `L'ibertarian Party pledge.

-- 

 "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident;  it's an art form!" 
   keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca       s. keeling,   aecl - whiteshell labs