[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- From: Freedom Remailer <mixmaster@gondolin.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 21:41:16 -0500
- Comments: This message did not originate from the address above. It was remailed by an anonymous remailing service. If you have questions or complaints, please direct them to <remailer-admin@gondolin.org>
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
> From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
> Subject: The subtle danger of using Mixmaster
> Message-ID: <shamrock-2409951151310001@192.0.2.1>
> Sender: shamrock@netcom19.netcom.com
> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
> X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.0
> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 19:51:30 GMT
> Lines: 19
>
> There are about twenty Mixmaster remailers. Reason to celebrate? Hardly.
> Though we have more remailers than ever, I doubt that the twenty or so
> Mixmasters are operated my more than six or seven people. I would not be
> surprised to find out that some folks are running several Mixmasters on
> the _same_ machine, using different IP addresses.
>
> While the enthusiasm for increasing the number of remailers is
> understandable, the operation of more than one Mixmaster by the same
> person is downright dangerous, because it reduces the effective lenght of
> the remailer chain. The message that you sent through five remailers may
> have only been handled by two operators. When you thought that five people
> had to colaborate to trace your email, only two are in fact required to do
> so.
>
> Comments?
>
> --
> -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
>