[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WAS_tem
>> The bill would expand the definition of child pornography
>> to include any [...]
>> image produced by any means, including electronically by
>> computer, if it depicts or appears to depict a minor
>> engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
At 10:40 AM 9/14/95 -0400, Rev. Ben wrote:
>If I'm reading this correctly, if I Photoshop a kids face onto the body
>of the latest Playboy centerfold, I'm in violation of this proposed law?
If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | [email protected]