[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Photuris Primality verification needed

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Photuris Primality verification needed
From: Phil Karn <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 1995 19:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (message from Tatu Ylonen on Wed, 8 Nov 1995 19:33:11 +0100)
Sender: [email protected]

>Including the provision for the 512 bit prime is *HARMFUL* and
>*DANGEROUS*.  Export control is not really an issue here, because if
>companies in the United States cannot provide secure networking,
>there are other companies in the world that can.

You've convinced me. I remove my proposal to include a recommended 512-bit
modulus. The smallest standard modulus will remain 1024-bits.

Phil

References:
- Re: Photuris Primality verification needed
  - From: Tatu Ylonen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Industry Group Rebuffs U.S. on Encryption
Next by Date: Re: Photuris Primality verification needed
Prev by thread: Re: Photuris Primality verification needed
Next by thread: Re: Photuris Primality verification needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread