Re: Oklahoma City - One Year Later - The Coverup Continues !

[Lisa Pease <lpease@netcom.com>]

And don't forget, if you haven't already - to read Rappoport's interview 
with an ex-juror from the OKC Bombing case, on my website (url below.)

			Lisa Pease
====================================================================

	 	    One person, one vote. 
		 Not one dollar, one vote. 
	End private government. Ban corporate donations.

Check out the Real History Archives  http://www.webcom.com/lpease
Read Contemporary Real History at http://www.webcom.com/ctka


On Wed, 17 Apr 1996 ssalgaller@CCGATE.HAC.COM wrote:

>      Suggested Reading:
>      
>      Oklahoma City - The Suppressed Truth 
>      By Jon Rappoport
>      Blue Ocean Press
>      2633 Lincoln Blvd., Suite #256
>      Santa Monica, CA 90405
>      (213) 243-9005
>      copyright 1995
>      $12 (post paid)
>      
>      At 9:02 AM on April 19, 1995, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma 
>      City
>      was damaged in an explosion that also left 168 dead and 600 injured. 
>      If you
>      look closer at this case, as investigative reporter Jon Rappoport has, 
>      you
>      start asking some questions about the "official' story:
>      
>      The damage was supposedly caused when thousands of pounds of a fuel 
>      oil and
>      fertilizer mixture was ignited in a truck parked near the building. 
>      Talk
>      about "oil and water never mixing". This mixture would have to be 
>      either
>      stirred or mixed just before use. It would also have to be detonated 
>      without
>      any air spaces, such as the gaps between the fuel drums, in order to 
>      work.
>      
>      Even if the mixture detonated, it should leave traces of oil. none was 
>      found.
>      
>      Even if it detonated perfectly, the explosion was 3 times too weak to 
>      damage
>      the building's reinforced concrete support columns.
>      
>      Especially column "B3". This column was sheared off at the 3rd floor 
>      level.
>      Only a shaped charge placed directly on the column at that level would 
>      be
>      able to cause this to happen. That section of the column was cut out 
>      and
>      removed as evidence. Will we ever see it again at the trial ?
>      
>      Local seismometers noted *two* explosions, 10 seconds apart. This was 
>      "explained away" as reflections of the explosion by underlying rock 
>      strata.
>      Ask a geologist if this sort of time delay has ever been observed 
>      before you
>      decide if someone is "underlying".
>      
>      What ever happened to "John Doe #2", seen with Tim Mc Veigh that 
>      morning ?
>      
>      What happened to John Doe's #3 and #4, seen leaving the area soon 
>      after the
>      explosion?
>      
>      Speaking of Tim, why (if the official story is true) did he advise the 
>      officer who stopped him that he had a concealed weapon ? Supposedly, 
>      he just
>      killed 168 people, including 19 children. What's one more if it means 
>      he
>      could get away ?
>      
>      And what about Terry Nichols ?
>      He was advocating killing Federal employees at a public meeting in 
>      Estes, CO
>      a year before the bombing. The FBI is very efficient, yet no one seems 
>      to
>      have paid any attention to Terry to prevent loss of life.
>      
>      What about the reported financial links to the bombing, not from right 
>      wing
>      causes, but from the Brittish Government ?
>      
>      Finally, what happens if and when the truth comes out in open court at 
>      Tim
>      and Terry's trial ? One could guess that the real suppressed story 
>      will be
>      one more casualty of the bombing.
>      
>      Unless we demand that someone explains column "B3".
>      
>      It *can* happen here - and it *did* a year ago !
>      
>      Book "review" by
>      Stephen S.
>      salgaller@aol.com
> 
>