[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Dr." Fred

In article <[email protected]>,
Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote:
> The difference, of course, is that its almost impossible
> to have sympathy for Dr. Fred. His hustle is for a hell
> of a lot more than subsistence. He was also never actually
> a master of his field, a fact that becomes increasingly
> obvious as our exposure to him goes on. Now he's reduced
> himself to trying to collect someone else's winnings.

So, what part of your analogy was valid?