[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose

To: Gary Jeffers <[email protected]>
Subject: [noise] Re: censored with Perrymoose
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 10:40:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]



On Fri, 3 Nov 1995, Gary Jeffers wrote:

>    Perry is again narrowly defining allowable speech on Cypherpunks.

Killfiles exist. Judging by the amount of ranting, raving, paranoia and 
please help!!! posts, isn't it inevitable that you'll get get some shut up
posts too? They make for entertaining flamewars (remember "my operating 
system is better than yours!!"? groan ). The frequency of [noise] postings 
might even be considered a decent PRNG.

Shut up shutting up ;->

References:
- censored with Perry
  - From: [email protected] (Gary Jeffers)

Prev by Date: Re: video as a source of public randomness
Next by Date: Re: Physician, Heal Thyself
Prev by thread: Re: censored with Perry
Next by thread: Re: censored with Perry
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread