[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)

To: Simon Spero <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 11:33:03 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected], Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960325075557.28271D-100000@chivalry>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960325075557.28271D-100000@chivalry>
Sender: [email protected]

Excerpts from mail: 25-Mar-96 So, what crypto legislation.. by Simon
[email protected] 
> If the Leahy bill is unacceptable, what legistlation is necessary? I 
> can't see how the use of cryptography in the commission of a crime needs 
> to be a separate offence, but I could see how it could be treated as a 
> special circumstance - that doesn't really needed a new law though.

Leahy's bill will not pass. Period. However, with the introduction of
this legislation comes a chance to get _our side_ heard by the unwired. 

-Declan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O', shame)
  - From: Rich Graves <[email protected]>
- Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
  - From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>

References:
- So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
  - From: Simon Spero <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O', shame)
Next by Date: Re: firewalls and CKE
Prev by thread: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O' , shame)
Next by thread: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? (Was List O', shame)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread