[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Devil's Bargain
The New York Times, July 21, 1996, WIR, p. 5.
The Devil's Bargain of a Better World
By Tim Weiner
Washington. The arc of the burning plane falling into the
ocean, the fire glowing on the dark waters, shed light on
how vulnerable we are. When a jumbo jet falls from the sky,
technology has failed or terrorism has succeeded.
In the hours after Flight 800 went down off Fire Island,
everyone in officialdom said there was no reason to believe
it was a terrorist attack. Nearly everyone else
instinctively believed it was.
However the facts turn out, it is revealing that Americans
thought first of a bomb borne by angry men on a mission
from God. There was no more evidence to blame it on it was
close enough to truth, given the absence of facts,
Americans' shared fear of terror and their faith in
technology.
In any event, if the crash turns out to have been an
accident -- horrible but still an act of God -- the relief
may be fleeting.
"It doesn't matter whether it was a bomb or not, in the way
we think of it -- it's what we expect," said Ronald Steel,
professor of International relations at the University of
Southern California and author of "Temptations of a
Superpower" (Harvard, 1995). "We know it's going to happen
somewhere --if not this airplane, then the World Trade
Center, Lockerbie, the bombs in Saudi Arabia and Paris and
London. This is a part of our life. If for some reason this
wasn't a bomb, we better get ready for one tomorrow." [See
Steel's NYT Op-Ed today: http://jya.com/rsteel.txt.]
High-Tech Freedom
With the doubled-edge sword of technology, Americans have
carved a world of gleaming aircraft and guided missiles.
The airplanes that transport them, the cell phones and
television cables and computers that link them, define how
they live, how they work, how they take their pleasure.
They are right up there with freedom of speech and
religion, freedom from want and fear. They make America
rich, powerful, and free.
But Americans cannot control technology; increasingly, it
controls them. And when the people Americans fear get their
hands on it, the fear is accelerated and amplified by 500
channels of interwoven media hype.
The airlines and telephones and E-mail that connect
Americans connect those other people too: a computer disk
is the crucial piece of evidence in the current trial of
Ramzi Ahmed Yusef, accused of planning to blow a fleet of
commercial planes from the sky (and in a pending case, of
leading the World Trade Center bombing).
The subway rider poisoned in Tokyo and the American soldier
blown out of bed in Dhahran share a common knowledge: High
technology may make a fine sword, but it is a flawed
shield. It cannot stop every nut with a grudge.
Americans are slowly getting used to the idea that one can
no longer go through the world without passing through
security. They are learning to live with terror and the
technology of counter-terrorism, as people have for years
in Tel Aviv and Cairo, Belfast and Berlin, Karachi and
Algiers. They all visit those cities now; they enter them
every time they walk through a metal detector.
So life feels more and more like an international airport:
identity checkpoints and security zones in concrete and
glass buildings, pretty flowers planted in concrete
barricades outside, robot voices delivering warnings.
The fear means they arrive early to spend more down time
waiting in line to pass through security. So they adapt,
thinking: That's not a barricade, it's a flowerpot. They
give up a little freedom in exchange for feeling safe, "all
watched over," as the late poet Richard Brautigan wrote,
"by machines of loving grace."
Visitors
The people who hate, love, envy and fear America's
prosperity and power, also pass through that international
airport. The United States needs their oil for fuel; it
needs their sweat for work Americans don't do any more.
They are woven into America, traveling through open lines
of trade and telecommunications and technology.
So everybody learns to live with the fear of the bomb in
the cargo bay: you have to catch that plane if you have
business abroad. If the United States were determined to
buy machines that could sniff out the Semtex in the
boombox, it could have done it -- the cost is perhaps $2
billion, or slightly less than one Stealth nuclear bomber.
But that is not the war Washington prepared to fight after
Vietnam. Generals today want wars they are sure to win.
We -- the United States -- have the smart bombs, built with
the billions that bankrupted Moscow and made America Number
One. They -- the furious and the powerless -- have the dumb
bombs, made from fertilizer and fuel oil, ignited by rage
and religion. But the United States can't stop them all,
not with its ever-tightening laws, not with its trillion-
dollar military, not with its weapons and warheads. So the
thinking goes.
On the simplest level, terrorism works: it terrifies. It
can increase the technology of control and erode the edges
of the Constitution. That can fuel the fear of Big Brother,
make people paranoid -- and in turn promote the homegrown
madness that exploded last year in Oklahoma City. Terrorism
cannot destroy the United States, but it has the power to
wound, outrage, sadden and change it.
When Iranians took Americans hostage and controlled the
nation's politics from half a world away, when a suicide
bomber blew up 241 American soldiers in Beirut and drove
the Marines from Lebanon, when the World Trade Center
shook, when the Dhahran barracks went up in smoke, it
expressed a burning anger in the world, the anger of the
poor and the powerless and the God-mad and the stateless.
The Method
Through repetition, Americans are slowly coming to
recognize the method in this madness: These attacks are
meant as blows against the global dominance of American
culture, money, power and technology.
Mr. Steel says the United States' stature as the one
surviving superpower and the architect of the new world
order is the very thing that makes it a target.
"Terror," he says, "is the weapon that the powerless use
against the powerful. We don't have any conception of what
an ideologically threatening power we are to people who
have different beliefs. Globalization and modernization are
truly threatening to people. They're even threatening to
the working class in this country because they drive down
wages. The very faith in technology that we spread is
something that runs head-on into another faith based on
tradition, asceticism and authority. We're the alien
ideology now."
[End]
----------
The New York Times, July 21, 1996, p. 25.
Top F.B.I. Investigator Is Known for Bluntness
James K. Kallstrom the head of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation s New York City office, is a technical wizard
who has bugged, wiretapped and generally bedeviled
mobsters, terrorists and other criminals for more than two
decades.
The crash investigation is the first major, high-profile
investigation of Mr. Kallstrom's tenure of a year and a
half. Since Wednesday night, Mr. Kallstrom has spent most
of his time shuttling, in a Blackhawk military helicopter,
between the F.B.I. command center, at 26 Federal Plaza in
Lower Manhattan, and the crash site, where he has held two
press conferences a day with a top official of the National
Transportation Safety Board.
Mr. Kallstrom is known for a no-nonsense, blunt approach
with his colleagues. He also never passes up a chance to
express some strongly felt opinions, they say. Often, Mr.
Kallstrom has offered his long-held view that Congress is
not doing enough to help Federal law enforcement in its
fight against criminals who use new technologies, such as
the Internet.
Since the crash Wednesday night, Mr. Kallstrom has had a
strong suspicion that it was tied to a bomb or missile.
"You have a lot of things that look like terrorism," Mr.
Kallstrom said at a press conference Friday afternoon. "At
some point in time, we're going to reach critical mass and
then we're going to be prepared to say exactly what we
think it is." As late as last night, he said he had not
seen anything to make him change that opinion. But
publicly, at least, Mr. Kallstrom has been reluctant to
declare that the crash was caused by a bomb or missile
until physical evidence, enough to reach a "beyond a
reasonable doubt" threshold, is found.
By selecting Mr. Kallstrom as assistant director in charge
of the New York Office in February 1995, the F.B.I.
Director, Louis J. Freeh, chose one of the bureau's most
respected surveillance experts, a man whose techniques
played a critical role in the arrests of every major
organized crime leader and terrorist in New York in the
last 20 years, including those involved with the World
Trade Center bombing in 1993.
[End]