[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
At 01:22 AM 9/3/96 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>At 12:53 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Stanton McCandlish wrote:
>> EFF in generally does not issue extremist position
>> statements, but is careful to examine the risks as well as the benefits,
>> and look for pro-liberty solutions to those risks.
>If the right to speak anonymously is an "extremist" position in the eyes
>of the EFF, then they are no friends of liberty.
>It is hardly an "extremist" position outside of such countries as Cuba,
>Iran, or China.
>It is the overwhelmingly mainstream position, not just among netizens,
>but when last heard, amongst supreme court judges and ordinary people
>in the street.
Not necessarily. The character of the anonymous speech is decisive. If you
use anonymity to cloak harassment, for instance, the anonymity (which
removes accountability) is a problem. The accountability issue is real and
should be addressed, not evaded.
Jon Lebkowsky http://www.well.com/~jonl [email protected]