[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Esther Dyson Flap
jim bell <[email protected]> writes:
> At 08:11 PM 9/2/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
> >Esther Dyson says that anonymity on the Net can do more damage than
> >anonymity in other forums, and thus may need to be regulated and restricted
> >in various ways. I disagree, as "the Net of a Million Lies" (to use Vinge's
> >term) has grown up with anonymity, and few people take the anonymous (or
> >not) rants and charges made in the millions per day with the same degree of
> >certainty they take print comments. Put another way, there is no clear and
> >present danger.
> Indeed, I support the elimination of concepts such as "slander" and "libel"
> precisely because they cause more harm than good. Currently, there is an
> illusion among ordinary citizens that "if that was untrue, you could sue him
> for libel!" despite the fact that this is rarely practical. In that way,
> the law actually adds credibility to what should be an incredible claim.
> Eliminate libel suits, and you've eliminated any presumption that because
> it's been spoken or is in print, it's likely to be correct.
The gubment has no right to fuck with any speech - (seditius) libel, child
porn, bomb-making instructions...
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps