[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rape, death and XS4ALL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on
05/05/97 at 04:37 AM,
Paul Bradley <[email protected]> said:
>> > > A ban on all handguns even when registered (currently all pistols above
>> > > .22 are banned and all guns have to be registered in a process whereby if
>> > > the applicant for a certificate has any history of political dissention
>> > > or crime (eg. Smoking a joint, the ultimate sin against society) the
>> > > certificate will be refused.
>>
>> What would be an example of such political dissention?
>Well, I`m pretty sure that, having recently been involved in campaigns
>against the ban on handguns, written to a number of people in positions
>of power over the proposed TTP scheme in the DTI white paper etc. my
>firearms licence will not be renewed the next time it comes up for review.
>The powers that be now presumably see me as a loon.
>A damning enditement on the British people is that last time I mentioned
>to someone my having written to the home office and others over the
>proposed gun ban I was called a lunatic and told "The sort of person who
>writes to the home office over something like that is the least suitable
>to have a gun".
>I can assure you this is not a one-off, this happens every time people who
> don`t shoot find out I do. They have been brainwashed by the tabloid
>press, for example, the daily mail ran a particularly vitriolic hate
>campaign against gun owners singling out Albie Fox, leader of the
>campaign against the ban, and calling him a "Gun obsessed lunatic". This,
>recall, is the same daily mail which rants every day about the "evil of
>drugs" and how the only way to "save society" is to throw everyone who
>doesn`t support their particular brand of bigoted fanaticism into jail
>for the rest of their life.
>And of course, one would imagine that those who actually owned guns and
>used them for sport themselves would be the most informed people who
>would realise that the criminal use of guns is at the opposite end of the
>scale to the sporting use allowed in British law. However, I know several
>people who have said "I`m happy to give up my guns if it will save
>lives", to this I simply reply "who were you going to kill?" then walk
>away, these people don`t even deserve correcting as their bullshit is so
>deep.
>In addition, when the police revoke or refuse to renew a firearms
>certificate, they do not need to give a reason, so one cannot even prove
>that it was because of speech or opinions they didn`t like that they
>revoked the certificate. Even if you could, it is unlikely a challenge in
>court would succeed, the UK does not have the same free speech guarantees
>as are given in the US and elsewhere, and any court challenge would fail,
>of that I am sure.
>Also, to worsen the situation, the labour party has now come to power and
>as I have already explained in a previous post this make matters even
>worse.
Well wait until after the next elections when we have a Republican
administration and apply for political asylum. :)
Someday the revolution will come and we can roundup all these bastards for
"crimes against Democracy". Anyone for Nurnburg II? --
- -----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
Finger [email protected] for PGP Key and other info
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: If at first you don't succeed, work for Microsoft.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Registered User E-Secure v1.1 ES000000
iQCVAwUBM3CF049Co1n+aLhhAQEm5gQAtPEEiYlY74JxyTlBb3vFj5/bBC5WnyjN
GnQV2MCykLVq0Y2KoRNEYXuuuEOwAAm58cdG468RoIKlpR1b88jZy37x9xUVC4U2
DZFUW8GSt3wLA81NCrNAARCCCHAVXMr8l/Ron0otBnPWCGgB2jYh58WZdNA0Cbed
JzhOjEgM2w8=
=/ZF/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----