[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Verisign gets export approval

To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>, shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: Verisign gets export approval
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:16:24 -0700
Cc: stewarts@ix.netcom.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <199707171339.JAA19638@homeport.org>
References: <3.0.2.32.19970716235341.0072b670@netcom10.netcom.com> fromLucky Green at "Jul 16, 97 11:53:41 pm"
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM

It seems to me that someone who has a one year export approved Verisign
cert should use it to authenticate a new top-level CA cert which they pass
to their customers.  Cut Verisign and their nosy/noisy partner out of the
loop.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The Internet was designed  | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | to protect the free world  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | from hostile governments.  | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Verisign gets export approval
  - From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
- Re: Verisign gets export approval
  - From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>

References:
- Re: Verisign gets export approval
  - From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
- Re: Verisign gets export approval
  - From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Censorware Summit Take II, from The Netly News
Next by Date: No Subject
Prev by thread: Re: Verisign gets export approval
Next by thread: Re: Verisign gets export approval
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread