[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)




James Love <[email protected]> writes:

> Paul Bradley wrote:
> >
> > > Tim, if you think that no web site are unambiguously inappropriate
> > for
> > > children, then you are in a state of denial.
> >
> > Please clarrify this for us: What sites would you classify as
> > unsuitable
> > for children?
>
>
> Let me you way out on a limb, and suggest the following entries, from an
> infoseek search for the workd PICS, would be unabiguously inappropriate
> for children.
>
> --------------------------------
>
> Pissing, Fisting and beastiality! We go to great lengths to bring you
> the Good Old Fashioned ALL AMERICAN Pornography, Just Like Dad Used To
> Watch! Unfortunately, We can't bring you everything!
> 55%   http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xxxp.html     (Size 4.3K)
>
> Absolutely the RAUNCHIEST NASTIEST Barely Legal Anal Bitches ANYWHERE!!
> The ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration, sloppy oral, and
> gangbang action!!! 100% GUARANTEED free xrated pics Action!
>
> 55%   http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xratedp.html     (Size 4.5K)
>
> -------------------------------------------------

This sounds like the kind of stuff teenagers are interested in, have
little trouble finding in the "real world", and usually lose interest
in by the time they're 15.

They're probably the majority of the readers of these particular sites.

And your point is?..

---

<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps