[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Yet another self-labeling system (do you remember -L18?)
> Let me you way out on a limb, and suggest the following entries, from an
> infoseek search for the workd PICS, would be unabiguously inappropriate
> for children.
>
> Pissing, Fisting and beastiality! We go to great lengths to bring you
> the Good Old Fashioned ALL AMERICAN Pornography, Just Like Dad Used To
> Watch! Unfortunately, We can't bring you everything!
> 55% http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xxxp.html (Size 4.3K)
>
> Absolutely the RAUNCHIEST NASTIEST Barely Legal Anal Bitches ANYWHERE!!
> The ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration, sloppy oral, and
> gangbang action!!! 100% GUARANTEED free xrated pics Action!
>
> 55% http://adult.mdc.ca/free/xratedp.html (Size 4.5K)
We can clearly come to no agreement here as I cannot see any material
listed above which would be harmful in any way to a viewer, child or not.
> I don't think I need much justification to suggest that "the
> ultimate in anal, double anal, double penetration, sloppy oral, and
> gangbang action" is unsuitable for viewing by "a certain class of
> people," --- namely children. Do you seriously dispute this? If so,
> there isn't much point in debating this.
Yes I do seriously dispute this. Can you tell me what in this material is
damaging in any way, can you cite examples, can you give causal evidence
of damage?
> That's what is going on now. Why one would want to encourage this is
> beyond me. Maybe fighting for the right to show the "ultimate in anal,
> double anal, double penetration" to children has redeeming value that I
> don't appreciate.
Then you fail to see the simple point of the redeeming value of true free
speech, there are no grey areas, you either believe it or you don`t.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, [email protected]
[email protected], [email protected]
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"