Cypherpunks Date Index for 1995 12




  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Q: Legal liability for Certification Authority
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: WTO an even worse possibility as Inet regulator
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: A challenge ...
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: A challenge ...
  • Re: WTO an even worse possibility as Inet regulator.
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Spam the Sign!
  • Re: VisaCash security.
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • nsa and netscape
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • RE: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Spam the Sign!
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: nsa and netscape
  • CPunks in the news: St. Jude
  • Re: I Agree buttons, GAKzilla & liability.
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: SKIP source release is out
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: key escrow compromise
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: I Agree buttons, GAKzilla & liability.
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Media Advisory: GAK on Dec 5
  • [NOISE]Re: AUTHOR A VIRUS, GO TO JAIL
  • GAK, Netscape, CyberDog, and you.
  • Re: nsa and netscape
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: CPunks in the news: St. Jude
  • I Agree buttons, GAKzilla & liability.
  • Re: key for Alice as promised (not)
  • available news/mail filtering
  • Re: Media Advisory: GAK on Dec 5
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Browser Reports
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • nsa and netscape (fwd)
  • Updated lists
  • Re: [NOISE] Barring access to Netscape
  • RE: digital receipts and cash
  • Aware's radiation detector
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: ecash lottery (Was: ecash casino)
  • DigiCash releases protocol specs!
  • Barring access to Netscape, a step better
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • The ecash protocol (for real)
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Attribution: GAK, Netscape, CyberDog, and you.
  • Re: GAK, Netscape, CyberDog, and you.
  • (fwd) Re: SKIP domestic Source release is available
  • Re: Aware's radiation detector
  • Re: nsa and netscape
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Draft agenda for 12/5 Key Escrow Workshop
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: available news/mail filtering
  • Cyberspace Inc & Robber Baron Age
  • A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Too much crossposting! Choose your community and stop crossposting.
  • Re: Aware's radiation detector
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Windows95 "Security"
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Re: Cyberspace Inc & Robber Baron Age
  • Re: available news/mail filtering
  • Re: Windows95 "Security"
  • Re: Netscape, Corporations, and GAK Support
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • C'MON N' GIVE 'EM HELL, NET-NERDS!!!!
  • Filtering Net Commercials
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Netscape, Mosaic, and other goodies.
  • No Privacy Right in UK ? - Part 3
  • Re: DigiCash releases protocol specs!
  • [NOISE] Fun quote
  • Re: A challenge ...
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Re: nsa and netscape
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • Re: nsa and netscape
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: GAK, Netscape, CyberDog, and you.
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • John Gage's comments at Computer Security Day in Cleveland
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • NSC Announce
  • Re: Netscape, Mosaic, and other goodies.
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • SHU_tup
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: C'MON N' GIVE 'EM HELL, NET-NERDS!!!!
  • Gibson Warfare
  • Re: John Gage's comments at Computer Security Day in Cleveland
  • Info Foes
  • re: SKIP source release is out
  • Re: DigiCash releases protocol specs!
  • Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Four Info Threats
  • Applied Cryptography MPLS Book Release
  • FW: websurfer 4.6 (fwd)
  • Re: DigiCash releases protocol specs!
  • lance's netscape-gak page
  • Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • FutureNet Registration
  • Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • EXO_ner
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Netscape GAK page.
  • Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
  • Re: Netscape GAK page.
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Re: WTO an even worse possibility as Inet regulator.
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Netscape Feeding Frenzy
  • Re: towards a theory of reputation
  • Re: [NOISE] Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: A "Warning Banner" for Netscape Navigator? Good idea!
  • update.250 (fwd)
  • unwanted AIP mail?
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Questions/Comments on ecash protocol
  • Fight.comp.crime.like.a.paranoid.FBI.psycho
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Remind me why we're so mad at Netscape
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Talking to Jim
  • No Subject
  • Use of PGP as an export?
  • Re: EXO_ner
  • Re: Remind me why we're so mad at Netscape
  • Re: Use of PGP as an export?
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol
  • Re: The future will be easy to use
  • bulk RC4 brute forcing
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • a foot here, a foot there -- pretty soon your mouth is *really* full (was: Re:Netscape, Corporations, and GAK Support)
  • Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 (fwd)
  • ANNOUNCEMENT: ALICE'S ADDRESS REVEALED.
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • No Subject
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol
  • prototype slot-machine
  • Re: GAK, Netscape, CyberDog, and you.
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: your mail
  • Add to List
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol (fwd)
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • French crypto restrictions - update ?
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Re: unwanted AIP mail?
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
  • Suggestion for CP browser
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ALICE'S ADDRESS REVEALED.
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: Suggestion for CP browser
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Transatlantic Agenda
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Code to detect netscape & send a message (was Re: Barring access to Netscape)
  • Jim Clark, "Mr. Bubble"
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Do the Right Thing
  • toy story: more power
  • Questions
  • Re: Jim Clark, "Mr. Bubble"
  • Mr. Bubble II
  • Sixth Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy
  • Re: Jim Clark, "Mr. Bubble"
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Re: Suggestion for CP browser
  • Re: EXO_ner
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol
  • Re: Talking to Jim
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • Globally legal Netscape
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: Globally legal Netscape
  • info?
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • apachessl info
  • Re: Globally legal Netscape
  • Pegasus Mail PGP Extensions?
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Jim Clark, "Mr. Bubble"
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: apachessl info
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Globally legal Netscape
  • Re: Globally legal Netscape
  • more examples of privacy invasion as a prelude to oppresion desired
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • Evil Prosecutors on the List
  • Re: info?
  • Re: Jim Clark, "Mr. Bubble"
  • Java Cup International -- $1,000,000 in prizes
  • Apachessl (was your mail)
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • .SIG disclaimer, clarification
  • Re: Apachessl (was your mail)
  • Re: Questions
  • Re: available news/mail filtering
  • NOISE for Anon-sam
  • Re: Do The Right Thing, Netscape GAK
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Compromise on Cyberporn Legislation
  • No Subject
  • No Privacy Right in the Americas ?
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • AOL DROPS RESTRICTION ON WORD "BREAST"
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Diskless "Eunuchs" Machines Likely to Fail
  • RE: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ALICE'S ADDRESS REVEALED.
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • GAK the Spooks not the Civilians
  • SEN_sor
  • Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: ALICE'S ADDRESS REVEALED.
  • GAK_hit
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • PRIVACY WATCHDOG OUTS BIG B
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: GAK_hit
  • [[email protected]: IP: NSC Announce -- iPower home page/CryptoSampler announcement]
  • Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL
  • Re: No Privacy Right in the Americas ?
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment Standard
  • RE: key escrow compromise
  • Re: "Got a subpoena?"
  • Re: towards a theory of reputation
  • RE: GAK_hit
  • Re: INTERNET SECURITY RISKS FOR CONSUMERS OVERBLOWN
  • How to steal ecash (was: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol)
  • [POINTER:] Crypto Articles in Dr. Jobbs Journal
  • Re: Cracked: WINDOWS.PWL
  • Re: SEN_sor
  • Re: key escrow compromise
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: [POINTER:] Crypto Articles in Dr. Jobbs Journal
  • Re: INTERNET SECURITY RISKS FOR CONSUMERS OVERBLOWN
  • Commercial Apachessl
  • Re: [POINTER:] Crypto Articles in Dr. Jobbs Journal
  • Re: INTERNET SECURITY RISKS FOR CONSUMERS OVERBLOWN
  • Re: SEN_sor
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: Questions/Comments on ecash protocol (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Privy Affairs
  • Re: towards a theory of reputation
  • Re: SEN_sor
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Netscape and Jim Clark
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Stylometry
  • NSA Frisbee [EXTREMELY FRIVOLOUS]
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • New version of SSL 3.0
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Crypto stuff
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • Re: GAK_hit
  • Re: GAK_hit
  • Tricky Netscape Security Hole
  • No Privacy Right on "My" Desktop ?
  • Re: Tricky Netscape Security Hole
  • Re: bulk RC4 brute forcing
  • Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech
  • The "Future" Fallacy
  • SF NSA FOIA appeal hearing canceled on the 6th. Go to San Jose!
  • Some info on file/memory erasing on NT
  • another fbi prosecution
  • Joining The Mailing List
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer! (fwd)
  • Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • Re: WARNING: sting via remailer!
  • gondolin.org remailer announcement
  • Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • Re: Joining The Mailing List
  • ZD Net Update v.1 #2
  • Re: Globally legal Netscape
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Secure versus ?
  • Re: No Privacy Right on "My" Desktop ?
  • Do companies ever do the "right thing"?
  • Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
  • [NOISE] [POINTER]
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • No More Netscape Comments from Me
  • Apache-SSL for export
  • Nutscapify (was Re: Getting a copy of the Jim Clark speech)
  • The Newspaper sez J.Clark sez "Uncle Sam Needed for Net Security"
  • USENIX Conference.
  • Re: another fbi prosecution
  • ANNOUNCE: December 9th: Bay Area Cypherpunks Meeting and Party
  • Re: towards a theory of reputation
  • latest librand source now available
  • Re: Do the Right Thing
  • latest librand source now available
  • Re: The Newspaper sez J.Clark sez "Uncle Sam Needed for Net Security"
  • Re: [NOISE] Barring access to Netscape
  • Re: another fbi prosecution
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: December 9th: Bay Area Cypherpunks Meeting and Party
  • Re: another fbi prosecution
  • Re: French crypto restrictions - update ?
  • Re: prototype slot-machine
  • Clarinet News Articles #1 [POINTER]
  • Re: towards a theory of reputation
  • NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: The Newspaper sez J.Clark sez "Uncle Sam Needed for Net Security"
  • Netscape Bug Bounty...
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • [Political Noise?] Banking law changes proposed
  • Re: Secure versus ?
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Re: French crypto restricti
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • New version of SSL 3.0
  • CFP '96
  • hack microsoft?
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • <no subject>
  • Secret Clearance (was: re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv)
  • Re: hack microsoft?
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: No Privacy Right on "My" Desktop ?
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • re: Secret Clearance
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • No Subject
  • Untraceability in Mobile Networks
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • re: Secret Clearance
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • re: Secret Clearance
  • Re: Secret Clearance
  • ERA_sur
  • NIST GAK export meeting, Long version part 1
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Re: No More Netscape Comments from Me
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting onElectronic Payment)
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: No More Netscape Comments from Me
  • Compliance Audits
  • GAK
  • re: Secret Clearance
  • Re: Netscape Bug Bounty...
  • News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • PGP
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • re: Secret Clearance
  • Re: Barring access to Netscape
  • Microsoft Internet Announcements Thursday, December 7, 1995
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: ERA_sur
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • Re: GAK Flap Happening at a Good Time--Journalists Read!
  • Re: Use of PGP as an export?
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: Secret Clearance
  • re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • Note on "Barring Netscape"
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: Note on "Barring Netscape"
  • Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret Clearance)
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: No More Netscape Comments from Me
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Kim Philby in Washington
  • Roger Schlafly's court hearing today
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • SKIP
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • unsuscribe
  • Cyberia-L Archive [was Re: ERA_sur]
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Civilizing Cyberspace (book note)
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Press Release on Response to Microsoft Internet Announcements
  • Responding to Exon -- technology is not enough
  • Re: latest librand source now av
  • [NOISE] Re: PGP
  • Re: The "Future" Fallacy
  • Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Untraceability in Mobile Networks
  • Re: latest librand source now av
  • Re: Note on "Barring Netscape"
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: Secret Clearance (was: re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv)
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • unsuscribe
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • SEQ_uel
  • Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • My conception of the ideal encryption tool for the masses
  • unsuscribe
  • Re: unsuscribe
  • list
  • ACLU Cyber-Liberties Update: 12/6/95
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: [FYI] FBI Training Eastern European Police
  • Re: Responding to Exon -- technology is not enough
  • Re: [FYI] FBI Training Eastern European Police
  • secure listservs?
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Persona PCMCIA URL?
  • Re: FW: websurfer 4.6 (fwd)
  • Plea for information
  • 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • (Fwd) General release of Open Encryptor interface for PGP
  • (Fwd) General release of Open Encryptor interface for PGP
  • Re: GAK
  • Re: Responding to Exon -- technology is not enough
  • Prayers Pay
  • Plea for information
  • Re: Responding to Exon -- technology is not enough
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • Re: latest librand source now av
  • NIST GAK, Escrow Agent Criteria available
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • Re: Secret Clearance (was: re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv)
  • RSA '96 Conference
  • Re: News on Congressional Debate on Exon
  • re: Re: Secret Clearance (was: re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv)
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Secret Clearance (was: re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv)
  • Re: Responding to Exon -- technology is not enough
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • Who Protects Us from the "Protectors?"
  • Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: SecretClearance)
  • Multiple questions
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: Inherent Insecurity of Internet Commerce! (was RE: Secret
  • [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment)
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • revised librand now on ftp.research.att.com site
  • Netscape stock on 12/7/95
  • Re: 1)Age etc CA 2)Swedish Digicash
  • Micro$oft and Java
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • CPUSA = CypherPunks USA?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • More FUD from First Virtual
  • Internet Stocks
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Micro$oft and Java
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Micro$oft and Java
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems? (was Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on El
  • Re: [FYI] FBI Training Eastern European Police
  • Anyone Remember socket.c?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: DigiCash releases protocol specs!
  • Java musings
  • GAK solutions was: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: GAK solutions was: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Micro$oft and Java
  • Strange Unix behavior dealing with utmp - anyone recognize this?
  • Re: GAK solutions was: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: Netscape stock on 12/7/95
  • Oh Yeah? ipsecure
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
  • (no subject)
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0
  • Re: [NOISE] WE WANT SOME PUSSY PICTURES
  • Re: Micro$oft and Java
  • Re: Solution for US/Foreign Software?
  • Secrets (was:Is there a lawyer in the house?)
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Cyberia-L Archive [was Re: ERA_sur]
  • Re: digital receipts and cash
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: PGP
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems?
  • Re: [NOISE] Re: FW: websurfer 4.6
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Java musings
  • @[email protected] XXX
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Escrow expectations
  • Java musings
  • Re: (Fwd) General release of Open Encryptor interface for PGP
  • Java musings
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: the X.9 Electronic Payments ANSI standard
  • Key Escrow Agent Criteria [Draft]
  • Re: (no subject)
  • Re: Netscape gives in to key escrow
  • Re:Internet Stocks
  • BAR_tur
  • No Subject
  • Re:Internet Stocks
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • GAK and Self-Incrimination?
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Anyone know of a white paper on security?
  • The Elevator Problem
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: Python Cryptography Toolkit v1.0.0
  • Re: Anyone know of a white paper on security?
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • "Information Technology for Control of Money Laundering"
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • BoS: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re: BoS: Netscape 2.0b2 allows for invasion of privacy (fwd)
  • Re:Internet Stocks
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • InfoWarCon
  • Re: GAK and Self-Incrimination?
  • NSA flying disk follow-up [Extremely Frivolous]
  • CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Rally in SanFran meatspace to protest censorship in cyberspace!
  • Oracle of Man
  • Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • SpeakFree (Internet real-time voice w/encryption?)
  • Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus?
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • NT v. Win95 Passwords (was Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus)
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • [FYI] Corp.Spooks Outed + W3 Proxy Filters
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus)
  • More elveator problem
  • Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Netscape speaks with a forked tongue:
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • E-Mail Privacy (CP boo)
  • Congress vs. the Internet
  • Re: NSA flying disk follow-up [Extremely Frivolous]
  • Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PW
  • Re: Geodesic Payment Systems?
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • MAG_got
  • .PWL spin
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • DC Cypherpunks Meeting, Dec 16. 3:00 PM
  • Diffie-Hellman with Blowfish
  • Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: CP: Mailing List Subjects
  • ideath remailer temporarily down
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • test
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • anonymous remailer
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Whew!
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • anti-copy
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Is it possible?
  • Re: Is there a lawyer in the house? :)
  • Re: A challenge ...
  • NSA rigs Crypto machines according to Balto Sun
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Is it possible?
  • NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Free calls to Govt (fwd)
  • Qcrypto page, Brassard's book, Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: anonymous remailer
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
  • Re: Free calls to Govt (fwd)
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: Escrow expectations
  • Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus
  • Re: Free calls to Govt (fwd)
  • Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus
  • Re: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus
  • mailing List
  • [NOISE] REQ: "Markov" filter as recently posted in .shar form
  • GAK Query
  • MD4
  • Re: NSA rigs Crypto machines according to Balto Sun
  • Paul Kocher's timing attack
  • Re: Warning about Pegasus Mail and PGP (fwd)
  • Re: Paul Kocher's timing attack
  • Re: Paul Kocher's timing attack
  • Re: Paul Kocher's timing attack
  • Announce: Timing cryptanalysis of RSA, DH, DSS
  • Re: [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer! (fwd)
  • Re: More elveator problem
  • *fnord* "Encryption Flaw Rattles Security Industry *fnord*
  • *fnord* "Encryption Flaw Rattles Security Industry *fnord*
  • *fnord* Addition info *fnord*
  • Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Welcome to cypherpunks
  • Your Majordomo request results
  • Questions for Mark Twain Banks
  • Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • OGY, chaotic scrambling
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • [Noise] A vaguely humorous post
  • No Subject
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Timing attacks
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: [Mix-L] WARNING: sting via remailer! (fwd)
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: NSA rigs Crypto machines according to Balto Sun
  • Re: [NOISE] REQ: "Markov" filter as recently posted in .shar form
  • DES Cryptanalysis
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • No Subject
  • Pornographic stories
  • Re: Questions for Mark Twain Banks
  • Re: NSA rigs Crypto machines according to Balto Sun
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker...)
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: NIST GAK export meeting, sv
  • ALERT:INTERNET DAY OF PROTEST TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1995 (fwd)
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Timing Attacks
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: [NOISE] GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker...)
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • [NOISE] Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: [NOISE] anti-copy
  • Re: More elveator problem
  • Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?
  • MD4 weaknesses (Was: Windows .PWL cracker implemented as a Word Basic virus)
  • Re: [NOISE] Is it possible?
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Anohter angle on timing (TEMPEST)
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Voluntary Key Escrow is Freedom, Surveillance is Privacy
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • ViaCrypt supports CKE in PGP
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: DES Cryptanalysis
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • The origin of some heavy legal terms
  • Re: [NOISE] GAK and self-incrimination?
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • In pursuit of the perfect frisbie (was NSA flying disk...)
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Third generation privacy
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, part 3 of 3
  • Re: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • Re: Re[2]: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual [NOISE]
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual [NOISE]
  • PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • Re: Timing Attack Paper
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Plaintiff's Opposition in Karn vs State Dept
  • Re: Win NT proprietary pw encryption (Was: Re: Windows .PWL cracker...)
  • Re: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • Re: anti-copy
  • Roger's case against RSA?
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: In pursuit of the perfect frisbie (was NSA flying disk...)
  • Re: Third generation privacy
  • Re: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Today's Baltimore Sun on the NSA...
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: EXON
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Hacking FV is just no fun (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual [NOISE])
  • Blinding against Kocher's timing attacks
  • Re: Timing Attack Paper
  • AOGOLD Trojan Program
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • YOUR ADVICE AND HELP PLEASE......
  • F. Y. I.
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • chaotic signal cryptography
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • (dcsb) CIS SEMINAR--December 15--Manasse, Micali, Rivest, Shamir--2:00pm
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Jim Quinn interview of James Norman (edited)
  • Re: chaotic signal cryptography
  • Re: Jim Quinn interview of James Norman (edited)
  • Re: EXON
  • Re: F. Y. I.
  • EXON
  • Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: [NOISE] anti-copy
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: EXON
  • Wanted: email for Calif senators & representatives
  • Re: <None>
  • Re: EXON [Noise]
  • Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?
  • Re: GAK and self-incrimination?
  • RE: F. Y. I.
  • Timing RSA and Certificates worth ??
  • IDEA encryption
  • Re: F. Y. I.
  • Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: Wanted: email for Calif senators & representatives
  • BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • Spotty c'punks service due to network outages
  • Timing RSA and Certificates worth ??
  • Re: Wanted: email for Calif senators & representatives
  • Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?
  • Re: IDEA encryption
  • <None>
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • EPIC Files Suit to Obtain C
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual [NOISE]
  • RE: ViaCrypt supports CKE in PGP
  • Re: Plea for information
  • KOC_her
  • Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Thursday noon, SF: Meatspace rally against cyberspace censorship
  • Using quantum cryptography to effect covert channels
  • Re: Time-based cryptanalysis: How to defeat it?
  • Computers, Freedom, and Privacy Conference -- Registration Open
  • NT Password Security Update. Registry values changed!
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • PGP/PINE integration
  • Re: EXON
  • Re: EXON [Noise]
  • The Elevator Problem (a.k.a. build a private key in public)
  • Re: Potential defense against timing attack on Diffie-Hellman
  • Re: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: EXON
  • e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • Re: EXON
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • PGP status in russia
  • Re: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • SmartGate
  • Re: Blinding against Kocher's timing attacks
  • Re: NT Password Security Update. Registry values changed!
  • Re: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • OSF security announcement
  • Re: IDEA encryption
  • Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc. AGAIN. (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )
  • Re: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual)
  • Re: PGP status in russia
  • Re[2]: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • Re: Spotty c'punks service due to network outages
  • Re: More FUD from First Virtual [NOISE]
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: Blinding against Kocher's timing attacks
  • Re: PGP/PINE integration
  • Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • [NOISE] Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • (U)
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • CryptoLib 1.0 now available
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Re: IDEA encryption
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Timing Attack Paper
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Mike Godwin Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
  • Re[2]: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: Timing Attacks
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Timing attack against RSA
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Re: e-Cash: CAFE vs. Mondex
  • 3rd party beneficiaries and certificates
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: The Elevator Problem (a.k.a. build a private key in public)
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: Jim Quinn interview of James Norman (edited)
  • Re: IDEA encryption
  • Re: CryptoLib 1.0 now available
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Re: NT Password Security Update. Registry values changed!
  • PGP Interoperability?
  • Re: PGP Interoperability?
  • Re: NT Password Security Update. Registry values changed!
  • Denver area meeting, SUNDAY, 12/17, 2 pm
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Kocher's RSA attack
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Authenication and CIRC
  • Re: Timing RSA and Certificates worth ??
  • Question about the Timing Attack
  • ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Kocher's Paper
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • PGP Interoperability?
  • Re: CryptoLib 1.0 now available
  • Digital Sigs and the Bar Committee
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Kocher's RSA attack
  • EMF loopholes and [Re: Kocher's RSA attack]
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: Kocher's RSA attack
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • [NOISE] Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: Jim Quinn interview of James Norman
  • Re: PGP/PINE integration
  • Potential defense against timing attack on Diffie-Hellman
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • And the standard continues to lower...
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source) (bounce-fwd)
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • [NOISE] The Enquirer
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • [UNIX] Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE? (fwd)
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Another One-Time Pad Reference
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
  • Re: OSF security announcement
  • Re: mailing list
  • simple Unix CPU time quantization functions available
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE? [getting noisy]
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • RE: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
  • Re: Blinding against Kocher's timing at
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • Obfuscating traffic flow (Re: : Pornographic stories)
  • Re: Kocher's RSA attack
  • DCSB: Future Scenarios for e$
  • Re: Algorithims
  • Re: [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc. AGAIN. (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )
  • Re: [NOISE] The Enquirer
  • Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
  • Re: PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy
  • PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Encrypted telnet...
  • Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Re: And the standard continues to lower...
  • Re: [NOISY] Re: Fwd: Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy
  • RE: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • INT_mes
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Apology...
  • Re: "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Re: Pornographic stories
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • QUERY: e-politics mailing list
  • NET - HLR on highway privacy (fwd)
  • Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • Alien Abductees, Flat Earthers, and other Fringoids
  • personal privacy
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • More Balto Sun on the NSA: Infowar
  • Re: NET - HLR on highway privacy (fwd)
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • e$: Seven Days
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Re: The Elevator Problem
  • Status of Apple proposal for wireless NII Band
  • RES_ist
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: .PWL spin
  • Java scripts to caputure remote timing info?
  • Re: QUERY: e-politics mailing list
  • Re: e$: Seven Days
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • The Elevator Problem & Groucho's Duck
  • Algorithims ?
  • Re: e$: Seven Days
  • DEC Alta Vista
  • Re: Balto Sun Followup: Crypto AG a friend of Cypherpunks?
  • Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, LONG part 3 of 3
  • Re: Netscape announces position against GAK
  • Re: Encrypted telnet...
  • Re: DEC Alta Vista
  • Re: More Balto Sun on the NSA: Infowar
  • Re: .PWL Spin
  • Balto Sun Followup: Crypto AG a friend of Cypherpunks?
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • taking electronic privacy into our own hands
  • Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • (fwd) Showdown over e-cash
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • Encrypted telnet...
  • Re: kocher's timing attack
  • Re: Is ths legal?... (fwd)
  • Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
  • Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
  • BosniaLINK
  • Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
  • Re: BosniaLINK
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • RE: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • RE: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: BosniaLINK (and other unnecessary posts)
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • 2 websites
  • Re: PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Oklahoma University: Is this legal?...
  • [NOISE] Screening of Unauthorized Access
  • Re: BosniaLINK
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
  • Re: BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Encrypted telnet...
  • IETF draft on data protection via crypto API
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: The Elevator Problem & Groucho's Duck
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Secured RM ? (source)
  • Re: [NOISE] BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • Re: [more NOISE] BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • GLO_bul
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • GIA_nts
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: redirect of newsgroups
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • (fwd) the anonymizer (Mac Anonymous Web Proxy?)
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Oklahoma University: Is this legal?...
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Fwd: Results of Internet Protest
  • redirect of newsgroups
  • Re: Securing the end-points
  • Re: my idea of the ideal encryption tool for the masses
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: redirect of newsgroups
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Securing the end-points
  • (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b
  • RSA Data v. Cylink hearing
  • Re: redirect of newsgroups
  • No Subject
  • Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b
  • Java and timing info - second attempt
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • PGP's randpool()
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • RE: Political Cleanup program
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • wish list for Crypto++?
  • Re: redirect of newsgroups
  • Re: Campaign Finance Reform
  • Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • New additions (12/18) for Karn vs State Dept
  • ZD Net Update v.1 #4
  • Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netsca
  • Re: (fwd) Economics of Digital Money.
  • (fwd) Economics of Digital Money. (part 2)
  • Antiterrorism Bill Dead
  • Mailbox soft limit exceeded
  • (fwd) Economics of Digital Money.
  • Re: Oklahoma University: Is this legal?...
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • RE: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • E-cash coin questions (Mark Twain / Digicash)
  • revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • DES modem
  • Re: Antiterrorism Bill Dead
  • Forged email to sway congress
  • cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • RE: Political Cleanup program
  • Please help
  • Re: PAY-OFF TIME FOR BUG-BUSTERS, NETSCAPE PLEDGES "DOGFIGHT"
  • Applescripts for monitoring Netscape Activity
  • Re: Forged email to sway congress
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • RE: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • No Subject
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • King Kong Does e$
  • Re: King Kong Does e$
  • Re: E-cash coin questions (Mark Twain / Digicash)
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Is ths legal?...
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Update on Microsoft .PWL and SMB Spin Control
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer)
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION PIONEERS PRIVATE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
  • mailing list
  • Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • ANNOUNCE: Windows 95 .PWL Security "Functionality Enhancement"
  • Bit Commitment Query
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • on web standards: sent to Markoff
  • Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • Re: Bit Commitment Query
  • Re: [even more NOISE] BIO-MUNITION: gifs of perl-RSA tattoo
  • Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape 2.0b
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Which countries don't allow encryption ?
  • Re: Which countries don't allow encryption ?
  • Re: (Fwd) SECURITY ALERT: Password protection bug in Netscape
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Correct URL Crypto Law Survey
  • Re: Which countries don't allow encryption ?
  • Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • Re: King Kong Does e$
  • KOD
  • CFS and Linux
  • Re: (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer)
  • FTC Privacy Initiative (fwd)
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: Motorola Secure Phone
  • The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: KOD
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Text version of Cyphernomicon
  • Re: Political Cleanup program [NOISE]
  • 900mhz digital phones - how much to trust ?
  • DCI_kgb
  • Re: KOD
  • Re: KOD
  • Please cut the "tude"!
  • ex encrypted script
  • Re: [NOISE] revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • NTT & electronic "cash"
  • Ruby Block Cipher
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: 900mhz digital phones - how much to trust ?
  • Re: FTC Privacy Initiative (fwd)
  • Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Surprise telecommunications bill?
  • Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff
  • An Apology to Mr. Merzger
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • QCF_dec
  • Re: Surprise telecommunications bill?
  • Re: (fwd) Junk email address collection (from a junk emailer)
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Vladimir Z. Nuri's fallacious defense of MS
  • Re: An Apology to Mr. Merzger
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Digicash and capital adequacy
  • QCF_dec
  • the problem with attacks on Blaze & Weinstein
  • The War on Some Money [long]
  • SSLeay 0.5.1
  • Cypherpunks resumes?
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff
  • attila's fallacious flagwaving
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: King Kong Does e$
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION PIONEERS PRIVATE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
  • Gates history
  • Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]
  • cyphernomicon
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: KOD
  • brief review of MIT 12/15/95 "micro-commerce" talks
  • Encryption Rules Coming
  • Re: KOD
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • KGB_cia
  • Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]
  • Re: Political Cleanup program
  • just a reminder...
  • FWD: Intuit and SSNs
  • Re: FTC Privacy Initiative (fwd)
  • Encryption Rules Coming
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: The War on Some Money [long]
  • Re: Bit Commitment Query
  • Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]
  • AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • Re: Cypherpunks resumes?
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • No Subject
  • Re: 900mhz digital phones - how much to trust ?
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: KOD
  • GAK boycott, What are legal implications?
  • Re: FTC Privacy Initiative (fwd)
  • Re: Encryption Rules Coming
  • Re: What ever happened to... Cray Comp/NSA co-development
  • Telcom bill report
  • Telcom bill report
  • Re: Telcom bill report
  • Re: The Problem With Blaze And Weinstein
  • Re: GAK boycott, What are legal implications?
  • Re: Microsoft Flame[tm] [NOISE]
  • Alta Vista caches queries
  • No Subject
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • [ecash] Re: Multi-issuer questions
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Newsweek Nerd 50
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: FWD: Intuit and SSNs
  • Remote use=export?
  • Re: on web standards: sent to Markoff
  • re: Encryption Rules Coming
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: Remote use=export?
  • Your Majordomo request results
  • PGP timeline FAQ... comments requested
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: GAK boycott, What are legal implications?
  • Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re:
  • Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!
  • No subject
  • Re: Remote use=export?
  • Re: Remote use=export?
  • Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • GAK shutdown?
  • Re: Attacking Clipper with timing info?
  • Weak keys in Diamond Encryption Algorithm fixed.
  • Cybercash questions...
  • Re: Cybercash questions...
  • Re: taking electronic privacy into our own hands
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: PGP timeline FAQ... comments requested
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: Newsweek Nerd 50
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • More developments in Karn vs State Dept
  • Re: [ecash] Re: Multi-issuer questions
  • Houston C'punk gathering
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • IW Mailing List iw/951222 (fwd)
  • Re: Navy hacked by Air Force?
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • ACLU Cyber-Liberties Update, 12/22/95
  • Re: Cypherpunks resumes?
  • Re: Cybercash questions...
  • Re: Cypherpunks resumes?
  • Welcome to cypherpunks
  • No Subject
  • Encrypted script - sort of
  • (fwd) Java implementation of secure login protocol
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re:
  • Re: CFS and Linux (fwd)
  • PAN_maw
  • Re: CFS and Linux (fwd)
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Announcing SecureDrive 1.4a
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux (fwd)
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux (fwd)
  • Re: [NOISE] Alta Vista caches queries
  • Re: 900mhz digital phones
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Polish telco policy change
  • Re: PGP timeline FAQ... comments requested
  • apache/ssl now commercially available
  • Re: Air Force hacks Navy? Eeeek!
  • Re: cyphernomicon FTP site?
  • Re: Java and timing info - second attempt
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Spread-Spectrum computer clock?
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • To Youall
  • Civility
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • TAX_zip
  • KID_zoo
  • RAT_357
  • FTC Privacy Initiative
  • [Noise] Re: Alta Vista caches queries
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • No Subject
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • corporate bashing
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE??
  • X-Mas-Pisswords
  • Mailing list
  • Jingling Bells
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: CFS and Linux (fwd)
  • Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: corporate bashing
  • Re: corporate bashing
  • bashing (fwd)
  • Re: PGP timeline FAQ... comments requested
  • Re: bashing (fwd)
  • [Rant] Flame threads
  • Re: Fred Cohen: Re: CFS and Linux
  • Re: [Rant] Flame threads and factual accuracy
  • Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • ROS_pig
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: FH radios
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: bashing (fwd)
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Future Scenarios for e$: The DCSB Forecast
  • New release (v1.3.2) of CFS encrypting file system available
  • Re: FH radios
  • Re: corporate bashing
  • Encryption Discrimination from Sun
  • Bidzos on C-Span 2
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Bidzos Coda
  • Re: Bidzos on C-Span 2
  • (cpx) Re: Bidzos on C-Span 2
  • Re: (cpx) Re: Bidzos on C-Span 2
  • Re: New Release of CFS
  • Re: ex encrypted script
  • anonther anonymous poster afraid to even tell us who they are
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: FH radios
  • Assault presses with cop killer computers.
  • HRB Systems Data Storage Encryptor
  • Re: Encryption Discrimination from Sun
  • Re: Assault presses with cop killer computers.
  • Re: Assault presses with cop killer computers.
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: HRB Systems Data Storage Encryptor
  • Re: FH radios
  • [NOISE] Re: anonther anonymous poster
  • Re: [Rant] Flame threads and factual accuracy
  • Mix Ported to DOS Yet?
  • Re: FH radios
  • COMMUNITY CONNEXION ANNOUNCES APACHE-SSL COMMERCE
  • Re: New release (v.1.3.2) of CFS Unix encrypting file system available
  • Cybercash security
  • Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: FH radios [Dave Emery] [Vaughan Pratt]
  • MD5 for DOS/Windows
  • Austin CPunk Video Update
  • Re: a new idea: stocks == currency
  • fun with rsaref and 64-bit machines
  • a new idea: stocks == currency
  • Rawbutt Day
  • Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION ANNOUNCES APACHE-SSL COMMERCE
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Bidzos on C-span
  • 900 MHz phones
  • Re: a new idea: stocks == currency
  • Re: Reputation capital: FIBS case study
  • Re: BoS: Re: Misconfigured Web Servers
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: FH radios [Dave Emery] [Vaughan Pratt]
  • Re: MD5 for DOS/Windows
  • FYI - telecom bill or not there are still censors
  • Some IETF drafts possibly of interest
  • Re: Cybercash security
  • Re: fun with rsaref and 64-bit machines
  • Re: fun with rsaref and 64-bit machines
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: Misconfigured Web Servers
  • proposal for new cyber abbreviation
  • Re: Some IETF drafts possibly of interest
  • cool cpunk project proposal: "cpunk approved" logo
  • [NOISE] Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • [NOISE] Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE
  • Re: DejaNews and Alta Vista Search Tools, and Privacy Implications
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: FH radios [Dave Emery] [Vaughan Pratt]
  • Reputation capital: FIBS case study
  • Re: DejaNews and Alta Vista Search Tools, and Privacy Implications
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: AWARD: CHRISTMAS NET SCROOGE - AT&T & NETSCAPE
  • Did anyone see...
  • Re: COMMUNITY CONNEXION ANNOUNCES APACHE-SSL COMMERCE
  • GEY_ser
  • Crypto specialist wanted
  • DOS - MD5 - Thanks
  • Re: Encrypted script - sort of
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • URL for cypherpunks
  • German government orders censorship of CompuServe -- a sign of things to come djf
  • Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Announcing a new alpha release of premail
  • Re: Telcom bill report
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • New! Improved! CryptoLib 1.1 now available.
  • Re: proposal for new cyber abbreviation
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: DejaNews and Alta Vista Search Tools, and Privacy Implications
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Re: Telcom bill report
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: Reputation capital: FIBS case study
  • Re: BoS: Re: Misconfigured Web Servers
  • Re: Announcing a new alpha release of premail
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • Cryptolib 1.1 rsa.c
  • Premail web server strangeness
  • Re: Telcom bill report
  • Re: Cybercash security
  • Re: Reputation capital: FIBS case study
  • FW: proposal for new cyber abbreviation
  • DOP_lip
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • DejaNews and Alta Vista Search Tools, and Privacy Implications
  • ANNOUNCE: NOISE.SYS random sampling device for DOS v0.2Beta
  • ANNOUNCE: NOISE.SYS random sampling device for DOS v0.2Beta
  • Proxy/Representation?
  • Re: DOS - MD5 - Thanks
  • VEL_cro
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: Only accepting e-mail from known parties
  • (fwd) RSA CEO Bidzos on USML/ITAR
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • IwinPak
  • Re: URL for cypherpunks
  • Re: URL for cypherpunks
  • Re: Cybercash security
  • Re: Cybercash security
  • Re: URL for cypherpunks
  • Re: FYI - telecom bill or not there are still censors
  • Laws, Politics, and Crypto Anarchy
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • blind validation
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: cool cpunk project proposal: "cpunk approved" logo
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • [reply to anonymous] Re: rsaref
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • Re: [reply to anonymous] Re: rsaref
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: cool cpunk project proposal: "cpunk approved" logo
  • Re: blind validation
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  • Re: cool cpunk project proposal: "cpunk approved" logo
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Ecash graphic images?
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • Re: Strategic Investments ....
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Strategic Investments ....
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: FH radios [Dave Emery] [Vaughan Pratt]
  • Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  • FW: your financial transactions posting (fwd)
  • Revocation of Zimmermann's fossil key
  • Re: Employer Probing Precedents?
  • Re: FH radios
  • ideath remailer permanently down / PGP key changes for Greg Broiles
  • practical annoyances from multi-level security?
  • CAV_ein
  • Re: ideath remailer permanently down / PGP key changes for Greg Broiles
  • Chinese Cypherpunk quote [NOISE]
  • Netscape 40-bit cracking. The new computing benchmark?
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring"
  • (fwd) DigiCash licencing?
  • Re: Proxy/Representation?
  • Re: Ecash graphic images?
  • Re: blind validation
  • easy avoidance of PGP signature forgeries and reuse
  • Re: HRB Systems Data Storage Encryptor
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • "Cybercrime" Article from Reuters
  • Telecom Bill Rewrite
  • Re: CAV_ein
  • Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  • CHU_chu Search Engines, Branded Communities
  • Re: Chinese Cypherpunk quote [NOISE]
  • Re: Netscape 40-bit cracking. The new computing benchmark?
  • Re: Housewarming/birthday party
  • (no subject)
  • Re: Netscape 40-bit cracking. The new computing benchmark?
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • "Deterrence"
  • Internet wiretap?
  • http://www.gsa.gov/irms/ki/sipmo.htm
  • January meeting (fwd)
  • (no subject)
  • Re: Zensoren ueber Alles
  • DIBS
  • Re: DOS - MD5 - Thanks
  • Re: blind validation
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • last straw
  • Re: another anonymous poster helping to destroy our rights
  • Re: easy avoidance of PGP signature forgeries and reuse
  • Re: Zensoren ueber Alles
  • Australian "calculatorcard"
  • NoneMurder, Inc. (was "Deterrence")
  • Re: Chinese Cypherpunk quote [NOISE]
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Positive Implications of the Compuserve Moves
  • January meeting
  • Re: CHU_chu Search Engines, Branded Communities
  • Zensoren ueber Alles
  • Re: Zensoren ueber Alles
  • Re: (fwd) DigiCash licencing?
  • PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: last straw
  • Re: last straw
  • Re: blind validation
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • 1OV_ert Net Tap 1
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Starting an e-cash bank
  • Re: Compuserve is Not "Censoring": Look to Governments for the Cause
  • Re: easy avoidance of PGP signature forgeries and reuse
  • new years resolutions for cypherpunks
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Guerilla Internet Service Providers
  • EMail Blockade for Compuserve?
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Trolling for L00ns was Re: is Freddy Boy a Loon
  • (NOISE) Re: PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: Australian "calculatorcard"
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: (NOISE) Re: PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • Re: [ecash] Re: Multi-issuer questions
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • RE: last straw (or Possible Developments re Censorship)
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Compuserve and copyrights
  • Re: Australian "calculatorcard"
  • Re: Is Dr Fred Cohen a Loon???
  • Re: (NOISE) Re: PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • (fwd) Benchmarks - revs 1.3.50 & 51
  • Re: Internet wiretap?
  • Re: Australian "calculatorcard"
  • Re: (fwd) Benchmarks - revs 1.3.50 & 51
  • Re: PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • Re: anon.penet addresses in .sigs
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Re: anon.penet addresses in .sigs
  • Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
  • Compuserve *hasn't* banned newsgroups
  • Re: Australian "calculatorcard"
  • SEY_use
  • Fred Cohen, PhD
  • Re: Fred Cohen, PhD
  • Can We Cut the Crap?
  • SecurIDs (was Re: Australian "calculatorcard")
  • (NOISE - LONG) Re: PLA_gue Germ Terrorism
  • put me on the list
  • Re: Fred Cohen, PhD
  • (fwd) e$: Looking down, not up, to the future
  • The F.C. flamewar
  • SHATEST (was: Re: DOS - MD5 - Thanks)
  • A great time to be a cypherpunk
  • Is this as insecure as it sounds (was FWD: Complete Fax Privacy Draws C
  • Re: Can We Cut the Crap?
  • Re: Is this as insecure as it sounds (was FWD: Complete Fax Privacy Draws C
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: FH radios [Dave Emery] [Vaughan Pratt]
  • Re: Is this as insecure as it sounds (was FWD: Complete Fax Privacy Draws C
  • [LOCAL] Next cpx physical meeting in SF Bay area?
  • US calls for measures against Internet porn
  • throwaway
  • Re: Is this as insecure... (really "Fax crypto")
  • Re: Australian "calculatorcard"
  • Re: US calls for measures against Internet porn
  • Re: For the New Year: A Symbol for Information Freedom
  • A weakness in PGP signatures, and a suggested solution (long)
  • ecash
  • Re: Travelling With Laptops/PGP

  • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.3